Live data from Hacker News

Gemini 3.1 Pro

blog.google

201–210 of 951 posts

Re: Gemini 3.1 Pro

#201

Ok, why don't you work on getting 3.0 out of preview first? 10 min response time is pretty heinous

I agree, according to Googles terms you are not allowed to use the preview model for production use cases. And 3.0 has been in preview for a loooong time now :(

Re: Gemini 3.1 Pro

#203

Price is unchanged from Gemini 3 Pro: $2/M input, $12/M output. https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing Knowledge cutoff is unchanged at Jan 2025. Gemini 3.1 Pro supports "medium" thinking where Gemini 3 did not: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/gemini-3 Compare to Opus 4.6's $5/M input, $25/M output. If Gemini 3.1 Pro does indeed have similar performance, the price difference is notable.

Sounds like the update is mostly system prompt + changes to orchestration / tool use around the core model, if the knowledge cutoff is unchanged

Re: Gemini 3.1 Pro

#204

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So much this. It's absolutely amazing how hostile Google is to releasing billing options that are reasonable, controllable, or even fucking understandable. I want to do relatively simple things like: 1. Buy shit from you 2. For a controllable amount (ex - let me pick a limit on costs) 3. Without spending literally HOURS trying to understand 17 different fucking products, all overlapping, with myriad project configs,…

You think AWS is better?

Exact reason I used none of these platforms for my personal projects, ever.

Re: Gemini 3.1 Pro

#205
Gemini 3 is still in preview (limited rate limits) and 2.5 is deprecated (still live but won't be for long).[0]

Are Google planning to put any of their models into production any time soon?

Also somewhat funny that some models are deprecated without a suggested alternative(gemini-2.5-flash-lite). Do they suggest people switch to Claude?

[0] https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/deprecations

Re: Gemini 3.1 Pro

#207

We've gone from yearly releases to quarterly releases. If the pace of releases continues to accelerate - by mid 2027 or 2028 we're headed to weekly releases.

But actual progress seems to be slower. These modes are releasing more often but aren’t big leaps.

Due to the increasing difficulty of scaling up training, it appears the gains are instead being achieved through better model training which appears to be working well for everyone.

Re: Gemini 3.1 Pro

#208
post #52

Pretty great pelican: https://simonwillison.net/2026/Feb/19/gemini-31-pro/ - took over 5 minutes though, but I think that's because they're having performance teething problems on launch day.

Models are soon going to start benchmaxxing generating SVGs of pelicans on bikes

That’s Simon’s goal. “All I’ve ever wanted from life is a genuinely great SVG vector illustration of a pelican riding a bicycle. My dastardly multi-year plan is to trick multiple AI labs into investing vast resources to cheat at my benchmark until I get one.”

https://simonwillison.net/2025/Nov/13/training-for-pelicans-...

Re: Gemini 3.1 Pro

#209
post #151
post #82

Google seems to really pull ahead in this AI race. For me personally they offer the best deal and although the software is not quiet there compared to openai or anthropic (in regards to 1. web GUI, 2. agent-cli). I hope they can fix that in the future and I think once Gemini 4 or whatever launches we will see a huge leap again

I hope they fail. I honestly do not wish Google to have the best model out there and be forced to use their incomprehensible subscription / billing / project management whatever shit ever again. I don’t know what their stuff cost. I don’t know why would I use vertex or ai studio. What is included in my subscription what is billed per use. I pray that whatever they build fails and burns.

Eventually the models will be generally be so good that the competition moves from the best model to the best user experience and here I think we can expect others will win, e.g. Microsoft with GitHub and VS Code

Re: Gemini 3.1 Pro

#210
Google tends to trumpet preview models that aren't actually production-grade. For instance, both 3 Pro and Flash suffer from looping and tool-calling issues.

I would love for them to eliminate these issues because just touting benchmark scores isn't enough.

Post reply on HN