That fits witj my experiences. And i want to add an otjer layer. In ai times its somtimes even nice to see some typos. You Casn be pretty sure it was not written by ai.
Privilege is bad grammar
11–20 of 292 posts
Re: Privilege is bad grammar
#12Re: Privilege is bad grammar
#13I think about the email i sent that was to be read by the CTO and i not only ensured it was totally correct, i asked a colleague to proofread it.
Re: Privilege is bad grammar
#14[flagged]
Re: Privilege is bad grammar
#15Re: Privilege is bad grammar
#16What is sad is that these people from the start think of good grammar as an effort to "look professional" (which they can then discard), and not as an effort to be clear, an effort which fits into the basic respect one gives other people.
who is "these people"
Re: Privilege is bad grammar
#17[flagged]
Re: Privilege is bad grammar
#18What is sad is that these people from the start think of good grammar as an effort to "look professional" (which they can then discard), and not as an effort to be clear, an effort which fits into the basic respect one gives other people.
Re: Privilege is bad grammar
#19Re: Privilege is bad grammar
#20At one of my previous jobs some of my coworkers and I had an in-joke about how it was possible to tell which of the emails from the CEO were written directly by him or not based on whether it used the spelling "pls" for "please" because of how often he liked to use it. It hadn't occurred to me to view this phenomenon in the way that the article does, but at least in my experience it certainly seems to be accurate.