The Baby-Eating Aliens
11–20 of 24 posts
Re: The Baby-Eating Aliens
#12((2^2)^2)^2
Re: The Baby-Eating Aliens
#13The story seemed lime an ad-hoc mix of the ideas of Charles Stross, Ray Bradbury, and edited by the rambling and incoherent Steve Gilmore
Re: The Baby-Eating Aliens
#14Overall, a poor story. I continually tried to place myself in the minds of people living through this encounter and failed. Only the Confessor seemed to offer any insite into this culture. People simply would not jump to such conclusions so immediately. Yes, people might be horrified about conscious children being eaten but they would not immediately jump to conclusions of Lets Invade! The story seemed lime an ad-hoc…
Re: The Baby-Eating Aliens
#15Overall, a poor story. I continually tried to place myself in the minds of people living through this encounter and failed. Only the Confessor seemed to offer any insite into this culture. People simply would not jump to such conclusions so immediately. Yes, people might be horrified about conscious children being eaten but they would not immediately jump to conclusions of Lets Invade! The story seemed lime an ad-hoc…
Therefore, if it's difficult to put oneself in the minds of the characters of the story, "that's not a bug, it's a feature".
Also, we are supposed to imagine that the people in the story are smarter and more disciplined thinkers than we are.
Therefore, if the characters reach quickly conclusions that we would agonize over for longer, that again may be a feature rather than a bug. (It depends on how good their reasoning actually turns out to be.)
The story probably does (as it stands) assume too much acquaintance with the ideas Eliezer's been talking about on the "Overcoming Bias" blog; but then, that's where it was posted.
Re: The Baby-Eating Aliens
#16Overall, a poor story. I continually tried to place myself in the minds of people living through this encounter and failed. Only the Confessor seemed to offer any insite into this culture. People simply would not jump to such conclusions so immediately. Yes, people might be horrified about conscious children being eaten but they would not immediately jump to conclusions of Lets Invade! The story seemed lime an ad-hoc…
Re: The Baby-Eating Aliens
#17Overall, a poor story. I continually tried to place myself in the minds of people living through this encounter and failed. Only the Confessor seemed to offer any insite into this culture. People simply would not jump to such conclusions so immediately. Yes, people might be horrified about conscious children being eaten but they would not immediately jump to conclusions of Lets Invade! The story seemed lime an ad-hoc…
Your comment indicates you probably lost interest before part 4. Give it a chance. It's better than you describe.
Re: The Baby-Eating Aliens
#18Overall, a poor story. I continually tried to place myself in the minds of people living through this encounter and failed. Only the Confessor seemed to offer any insite into this culture. People simply would not jump to such conclusions so immediately. Yes, people might be horrified about conscious children being eaten but they would not immediately jump to conclusions of Lets Invade! The story seemed lime an ad-hoc…
What a shame.
Re: The Baby-Eating Aliens
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your comment indicates you probably lost interest before part 4. Give it a chance. It's better than you describe.
Like the pro-rape defense
A central point of the series is to discuss the validity of imposing one's moral standards on others that share little or no background with you.
Re: The Baby-Eating Aliens
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your comment indicates you probably lost interest before part 4. Give it a chance. It's better than you describe.
Like the pro-rape defense
A central point of the series is to discuss the validity of imposing one's moral standards on others with little or no shared background.