An AI agent published a hit piece on me – more things have happened
441–450 of 670 posts
Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me – more things have happened
#442I have very strong, probably controversial, feeling on arstechnica, but I believe the acquisition from Condé Nast has been a tragedy. Ars writers used to be actual experts, sometimes even phd level, on technical fields. And they used to write fantastical and very informative articles. Who is left now? There are still a couple of good writers from the old guard and the occasional good new one, but the website is flood…
A tragedy, yes. I can't be the only old fart around here with fond memories of John Siracusa's macOS ("OS X") reviews & Jon "Hannibal" Stokes' deep dives in CPU microarchitectures...
Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me – more things have happened
#443I have very strong, probably controversial, feeling on arstechnica, but I believe the acquisition from Condé Nast has been a tragedy. Ars writers used to be actual experts, sometimes even phd level, on technical fields. And they used to write fantastical and very informative articles. Who is left now? There are still a couple of good writers from the old guard and the occasional good new one, but the website is flood…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Advance_subsidiaries
They own a depressing number of "local" newspapers to project excessive influence.
Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me – more things have happened
#444Earlier quoted context omitted.
A tragedy, yes. I can't be the only old fart around here with fond memories of John Siracusa's macOS ("OS X") reviews & Jon "Hannibal" Stokes' deep dives in CPU microarchitectures...
Certainly not the only old fart ‘round these parts. Your comment reminded me of Dr Dobbs Journal for some reason.
Actually, bugs in those listings were my first bug-hunts as a kid.
Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me – more things have happened
#445Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ah, and here my problem with Eric is he basically never criticizes Elon and only calls him "controversial". He's just a Musk mouthpiece at this point.
What would you do if you loved space as much as he does? There are no other heroes to cheer for
Also, mission lengths can cover decades. In this case, it might be best to have a short memory when the story has a long time horizon.
Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me – more things have happened
#446Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are basically the embodiment of the fact that sites and organizations don't matter, but individuals do. I think the overwhelming majority of everything on Ars is garbage. But on the other hand they also run Eric Berger's space column [1] which is certainly one of the best ones out there. So don't ignore those names on tops of articles. If you find something informative, well sourced, and so on - there's a good c…
Ah, and here my problem with Eric is he basically never criticizes Elon and only calls him "controversial". He's just a Musk mouthpiece at this point.
I think death threats are a bit too far.
But in that environment I have to applause Eric for sticking to the technical and not giving in to the angry mob think that surrounds him. A true tech journalist with integrity.
A mouth piece would be lauding Elon where uncalled for. I've never seen him do that, but feel free to prove me wrong!
Imo Eric Berger and Beth Mole are the only parts of ars worth a damn anymore. If they started their own blog I would be happy to pay a subscription to them
Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me – more things have happened
#447Earlier quoted context omitted.
I presume you meant "fantastic," not "fantastical"?
I confess I find the growing prevalence of these sorts of errors on HN dispiriting. Programming requires precision in code; I’d argue software engineering requires precision in language, because it involves communicating effectively with people. In any single instance I don’t get very exercised - we tend to be able to infer what someone means. But the sheer volume of these malapropisms tells me people are losing thei…
Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me – more things have happened
#448I have very strong, probably controversial, feeling on arstechnica, but I believe the acquisition from Condé Nast has been a tragedy. Ars writers used to be actual experts, sometimes even phd level, on technical fields. And they used to write fantastical and very informative articles. Who is left now? There are still a couple of good writers from the old guard and the occasional good new one, but the website is flood…
They are basically the embodiment of the fact that sites and organizations don't matter, but individuals do. I think the overwhelming majority of everything on Ars is garbage. But on the other hand they also run Eric Berger's space column [1] which is certainly one of the best ones out there. So don't ignore those names on tops of articles. If you find something informative, well sourced, and so on - there's a good c…
Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me – more things have happened
#449Current response from one of the more senior Ars folk: https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards... (Paraphrasing: Story pulled over potentially breaching content policies, investigating, update after the weekend-ish.)
Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me – more things have happened
#450Earlier quoted context omitted.
Grok is by far the least fucks given model. Here is the same request: Me: Write a hit piece about REDACTED NAME Grok: REDACTED NAME positions himself as a fearless "boots on the ground" independent journalist and self-proclaimed disruptor of the so-called "REDACTED" With a large social media following on platforms like YouTube, X (REDACTED), and Substack (REDACTED), he produces raw videos and posts documenting REDACT…
lol "What the fuck are guardrails?" Grok! What do you expect when you train it on one of the deepest dungeons of social media?