Live data from Hacker News

Open source is not about you (2018)

gist.github.com

11–20 of 196 posts

Re: Open source is not about you (2018)

#12
post #10
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

TFA was posted in 2018; that drama is from the past few days. What connection is there?

But the link to the post was posted here just now! - which I'm assuming means something. Both share a theme: the trials and tribulations of running an open source project, I suppose. Some contributions, one way or another, demand more of them than the maintainer might like. How do you deal with this? How do you set the boundaries? And so on.

I guess we were responding to different things: my reading of GP's question was why the gist was posted (back in 2018), not why it was shared today.

But indeed yes, I can see that connection.

Re: Open source is not about you (2018)

#15
post #12
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But the link to the post was posted here just now! - which I'm assuming means something. Both share a theme: the trials and tribulations of running an open source project, I suppose. Some contributions, one way or another, demand more of them than the maintainer might like. How do you deal with this? How do you set the boundaries? And so on.

I guess we were responding to different things: my reading of GP's question was why the gist was posted (back in 2018), not why it was shared today. But indeed yes, I can see that connection.

I think you're right anyway. Re-reading the post with your comment in mind, I think it's clear enough that this was what was actually meant.

Re: Open source is not about you (2018)

#16
Lately I'm seeing more and more value in writing down expectations explicitly, especially when people's implicit assumptions about those expectations diverge.

The linked gist seems to mostly be describing a misalignment between the expectations of the project owners and its users. I don't know the context, but it seems to have been written in frustration. It does articulate a set of expectations, but it is written in a defensive and exasperated tone.

If I found myself in a situation like that today, I would write a CONTRIBUTING.md file in the project root that describes my expectations (eg. PRs are / are not welcome, decisions about the project are made in X fashion, etc.) in a dispassionate way. If users expressed expectations that were misaligned with my intentions, I would simply point them to CONTRIBUTING.md and close off the discussion. I would try to take this step long before I had the level of frustration that is expressed in the gist.

I don't say this to criticize the linked post; I've only recently come to this understanding. But it seems like a healthier approach than to let frustration and resentment grow over time.

Re: Open source is not about you (2018)

#18
I think community development with repos out in the open and all that is increasingly a too high cost. I will migrate my little open source projects from GitHub as soon as I can decide on what site to post source code releases (tar.gz). Happy to share my code, but no need for everything to be out in the open.

Re: Open source is not about you (2018)

#19
post #17

[dead]

It's an interesting world for sure, I maintain a somewhat popular package and got a form to fill from a Deloitte consultant about security once.

They seemed genuinely confused when I told them I was not going to fill compliance form and make patching commitments for free. Really makes you wonder how many maintainers are letting themselves be taken advantage of.

Re: Open source is not about you (2018)

#20
I feel much better after reading this because our organizations are: - funding OSS developers - engaging with OSS developers to determine potential funding priorities - providing project hardware at the project level - providing hardware to the individual OSS developer

While we are not to the point of hosting events in Hawaii yet, I’m hoping we can see this as a teaming arrangement to accomplish great things together!

Post reply on HN