Live data from Hacker News

Ring owners are returning their cameras

msn.com

51–60 of 314 posts

Re: Ring owners are returning their cameras

#51
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The ad https://youtu.be/OheUzrXsKrY?si=oHH1hBRIYjNNgPZT

Thanks. This is actually kinda cute. After all the shit Amazon and the company did I am surprised this should be the thing that gets people worried

Oooh, heckin’ doggos, so cute!!!1

Re: Ring owners are returning their cameras

#52
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Weirdly yes. But why is formulated that you can tell it's an American writing text only an American could believe from the first words.

[flagged]

Generalizing Europe this way is almost always American.

Re: Ring owners are returning their cameras

#53
post #12

Good. But people should not have pointed cameras into public spaces and live streamed everything to the cloud to begin with. Walking past a house with a camera doorbell makes me really uncomfortable, like I'm being watched.

I have a local one (reolink). Prompted by neighbors getting robbed unfortunately. Will this prevent crime? Maybe some but probably not all. But it would let me know if I have to file a stolen package claim or should wait on the package for a few more days. Plus it has been doubling as a trail camera for the local fauna I had no idea came by so frequently. It faces private property only as it is set up.

You can always put the cameras inside the home and disable WAN access. Best of all worlds.

Re: Ring owners are returning their cameras

#54
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks. This is actually kinda cute. After all the shit Amazon and the company did I am surprised this should be the thing that gets people worried

Oooh, heckin’ doggos, so cute!!!1

Should have used a brownish "missing kid" to make it even more transparent

Re: Ring owners are returning their cameras

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Once something illegal is culturally accepted it’s very difficult to remove, it requires a cultural shift. It’s against the law to post cctv onto things like Facebook in the U.K. but people donor all the time. Early on the law could have banned cloud cameras but it’s too late now, far too many people like to answer front their phones. So glad I no ln get deliver pizzas.

>>It’s against the law to post cctv onto things like Facebook in the U.K. I live in the UK and first time I'm hearing about this - it's definitely illegal to record your neighbours or members of the public without permission, but AFAIK if you are recording videos of your own driveway you can post those anywhere you like since there is no privacy issue there. Have you got any more info about this? Edit: let me clarify…

It's not illegal to record members of the public without permission in the UK. The test is mostly about whether someone has a reasonable expectation of privacy, but there are all sorts of other considerations:

https://sprintlaw.co.uk/articles/can-you-film-people-in-publ...

Re: Ring owners are returning their cameras

#56
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Once something illegal is culturally accepted it’s very difficult to remove, it requires a cultural shift. It’s against the law to post cctv onto things like Facebook in the U.K. but people donor all the time. Early on the law could have banned cloud cameras but it’s too late now, far too many people like to answer front their phones. So glad I no ln get deliver pizzas.

> Once something illegal is culturally accepted it’s very difficult to remove, it requires a cultural shift. I agree. And that's sensible. We don't want the law and culture to diverge too much. The former is meant to serve the latter. But I do still think it would be possible to start going after the suppliers of the services.

> The former is meant to serve the latter.

Bear in mind europe is known for millennia of pogroms and ethnic cleansing (like, I'm sure, many other parts of the world). Sometimes the culture must bend towards the needs of a stable culture.

Re: Ring owners are returning their cameras

#57

American surveillance is one thing. All over Europe people install Chinese IP cameras mostly from paranoic and imaginary reasons. Camera literally facing neighbour's windows and doors and their neighbour's own camera. Nobody understands that it's economically impossible to sell IP camera with a mobile app and cloud storage of video for 150 EUR. Their business model is not simply selling cameras. EDIT. I'm really conf…

> Nobody understands that it's economically impossible to sell IP camera with a mobile app and cloud storage of video for 150 EUR.

Then maybe those cunts can sell a camera without cloud storage for once? Or the one that connects to local hub, like Chinese cameras do?

Re: Ring owners are returning their cameras

#58
post #42

I predict 100 returns in total and then everybody forgets about this in a week. I'm not cheering for this outcome but it's the sad reality.

In their defense, Redditors returning a throwaway piece of electronics then posting about it is probably the biggest sense of accomplishment they'll get all month.

It takes a special level of delusion to think you're pulling one over on the billion-dollar company who just paid millions to advertise this capability during the Super Bowl as if everyone didn't already know.

Hasn't Ring been sharing video with law enforcement for years? Ignoring that zomg ICE is the Reddit cause du jour (these people live for this), did they just now figure out how cloud-connected cameras work?

I fully expect these to all be replaced with generic cameras from Amazon full of security holes, that upload all video to CCP-controlled servers in China.

Re: Ring owners are returning their cameras

#59
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

to get some feeling of it one can watch footage from Ukraine where drones with IR hunt soldiers at night. At the beginning of war, when soldiers didn't yet started to take it into account, there would even be whole groups walking like they would be at night feeling invisible, and that would be the last seconds before the explosion lights up the screen. These days there is more experience with it, and for example to g…

You don't even need to get so "fancy" [0] as IR cameras. "Nightvision" by way of light amplification has been around for ages. [1] Even the cheap stuff I played with decades ago lit up the night like nobody's business if there was even the smallest amount of moonlight. The downside was that bright lights made the image useless, but if you're building a robot, or running the video feed back to an operator you'd simply…

Just an example of what a prosumer camera could do 12 years ago from a Sony A7s:

https://philipbloom.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/SONY...

This camera is capable of iso 409,600, 4 stops higher than this image. I mean this is turning night into day.

Re: Ring owners are returning their cameras

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The world is going to be filled with millions of cameras using AI to analyze the video in real time.

Doesn't have to be. Here in the Netherlands it's actually illegal to (permanently) film public space, and people can and will point that out to any offenders.

With many exceptions of course.
Post reply on HN