China accounts for more than 25% of the global net increase in leaf area between 2000 and 2017, according to NASA data https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/plants/china-has-pl... China's also been a major supporter of the Great Green Wall of Africa providing technology and funding. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3302068/why-...
So many trees planted in Taklamakan Desert that it's turned into a carbon sink
41–50 of 91 posts
Re: So many trees planted in Taklamakan Desert that it's turned into a carbon sink
#42https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/climate/trump-epa-greenho...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/12/trump-epa-ro...
Re: So many trees planted in Taklamakan Desert that it's turned into a carbon sink
#43Do initiatives like these hurt native desert species?
Re: So many trees planted in Taklamakan Desert that it's turned into a carbon sink
#44Re: So many trees planted in Taklamakan Desert that it's turned into a carbon sink
#45[flagged]
Re: So many trees planted in Taklamakan Desert that it's turned into a carbon sink
#46Do initiatives like these hurt native desert species?
Re: So many trees planted in Taklamakan Desert that it's turned into a carbon sink
#47How much deforestation over the past decades has been reversed and is deforestation currently under control?
The main problem with attempts at reversing the damage is that forests aren't fungible. An old growth forest has a rich, balanced ecosystem. Newly planted forests tend to be susceptible to catastrophic damage by various critters, as the species mix is much less complex, and their fauna and flora is relatively impoverished.
Re: So many trees planted in Taklamakan Desert that it's turned into a carbon sink
#48China accounts for more than 25% of the global net increase in leaf area between 2000 and 2017, according to NASA data https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/plants/china-has-pl... China's also been a major supporter of the Great Green Wall of Africa providing technology and funding. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3302068/why-...
Re: So many trees planted in Taklamakan Desert that it's turned into a carbon sink
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
The main problem with attempts at reversing the damage is that forests aren't fungible. An old growth forest has a rich, balanced ecosystem. Newly planted forests tend to be susceptible to catastrophic damage by various critters, as the species mix is much less complex, and their fauna and flora is relatively impoverished.
So you just need to be stubborn until they stick or cleverer in how you go about it?
An old forest is a result of multiple waves successions after disasters (fire, windstorms etc.), which are really hard to emulate. Some desirable seedlings are hard to grow artificially, others just won't prosper in situ unless/until very specific conditions are met...
After a long enough time, the forest will eventually revert to a fully natural state, but that time is way longer than human lifetime. It is a living organism of sorts and living organisms are much easier to kill than to re-create.
Re: So many trees planted in Taklamakan Desert that it's turned into a carbon sink
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://www.sunbeltrentals.co.uk/news-and-blogs/decrease-you... > Of course, we know that fuel consumption varies drastically from machine to machine, so we’ve looked at an example of a very high utilisation rate too. We found that an 8T excavator that spent 11 hours and 3 minutes working, 1 hour and 6 minutes of which were idle, it used 89 litres of fuel and resulted in 237.4kgs of carbon emissions. 4 hours saved on…
That tree carbon capture estimate is probably conservative here if planting trees achieved de-desertification and resulted a larger thriving ecosystem.