Live data from Hacker News

Why vampires live forever

machielreyneke.com

11–20 of 193 posts

Re: Why vampires live forever

#12
The article misses the simplest technique:

Just donate blood as often as possible. This results in a loss of cholesterol, other bad lipoproteins, excess iron in those who have it, and PFAS toxins. It is frequency-dependently associated with longevity.

Whole blood donation avoids the plastic lining of plasma donations, with the latter undesirably transferring unwanted microplastics into the body.

For those with sufficient spare money, instead of donating blood, just get various blood tests every other week, additively comparable to a donation if the tests are substantial.

Granted, this is antithetical to being a vampire, but you will still have to make up for it by supplementing sufficient healthy nutrients, e.g. electrolytes, ferric pyrophosphate, protein, etc. to allow your body to quickly restore the lost blood.

As a disclaimer, do not ever donate blood if you use narcotics, disallowed drugs, injectable drugs, or have unsafe intimate practices, or might have chagas or TB or even long Covid.

Re: Why vampires live forever

#15
post #8

This is a fun story from the early 18th century if you haven't read about it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Count_of_St._Germain

And I don't want to add fuel to a strange fire, but in 1764 when Jean-Jacques Rousseau wrote a letter to Beaumont regarding the absurdity of belief despite evidence, he used this as an example:

"If there is in this world a well-attested account, it is that of vampires. Nothing is lacking: official reports, affidavits of well-known people, of surgeons, of priests, of magistrates; the judicial proof is most complete."

Re: Why vampires live forever

#16
Completely OT: In the link “what the longevity experts don’t tell you”[1] I found this:

“As a devout Baptist, he couldn’t use playing cards…”

And I’m wondering if I missed something in my Baptist upbringing. I have long since removed myself from any semblance of the Church and manage my own relationship with faith and any related higher beings, so it’s more a curiosity than pertinent.

1 - https://machielreyneke.com/blog/longevity-lessons/

Re: Why vampires live forever

#17
>They drink blood because their own blood accumulates factors that accelerate aging, and they need to periodically dilute it. Feeding isn’t nutrition. It’s dialysis.

This seems to be the emerging consensus. When you get older your metabolism creates all kinds of crap that circulates in the blood.

You would like to have boosted kidneys parallel to real ones that can detect and remove all the slightly wrong proteins.

Re: Why vampires live forever

#18
post #9

Interesting... I first went to the linked recent post What the Longevity Experts Don't Tell You. Sorry to be harsh: it was nonsense. It just lists a few weird, unscientific behaviours of John D Rockefeller and tries to draw lessons (to what end? longevity? is Rockefeller still alive?) from them despite there being no indication those behaviors even had any effect, let alone positive impact on longevity. It also doesn…

Also weird it didn't mention Peter Attia's connection to Epstein outright. It did this weird tongue-in-cheek thing for a few paragraphs referencing Epstein only in the foot notes. I still can't tell whether what I read was actually praising these guys or extremely subtly sardonic.

Re: Why vampires live forever

#19

>They drink blood because their own blood accumulates factors that accelerate aging, and they need to periodically dilute it. Feeding isn’t nutrition. It’s dialysis. This seems to be the emerging consensus. When you get older your metabolism creates all kinds of crap that circulates in the blood. You would like to have boosted kidneys parallel to real ones that can detect and remove all the slightly wrong proteins.

Are there any reasons for this to work on non-vampires? :D

Re: Why vampires live forever

#20
post #9

Interesting... I first went to the linked recent post What the Longevity Experts Don't Tell You. Sorry to be harsh: it was nonsense. It just lists a few weird, unscientific behaviours of John D Rockefeller and tries to draw lessons (to what end? longevity? is Rockefeller still alive?) from them despite there being no indication those behaviors even had any effect, let alone positive impact on longevity. It also doesn…

It's not nonsense, it's satire. I was laughing most of the way through both of these articles.

The Rockefeller one literally points out that the guy did all this weird stuff and then his son, who didn't, outlived him.

Post reply on HN