Live data from Hacker News

Ex-GitHub CEO launches a new developer platform for AI agents

entire.io

281–290 of 625 posts

Re: Ex-GitHub CEO launches a new developer platform for AI agents

#281

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dohmke never spoke clearly to developers when he was GitHub's CEO.

A CEO is never speaking to developers, he's speaking to other CEOs.

CEOs have many audiences; great CEOs communicate capably with each.

FWIW it's not entirely clear to me who Entire's long-term customer is, but the (interesting!) CLI that shipped today is very much for developers who are busy building with agents.

Re: Ex-GitHub CEO launches a new developer platform for AI agents

#282
post #254

> Checkpoints are a new primitive that automatically captures agent context as first-class, versioned data in Git. When you commit code generated by an agent, Checkpoints capture the full session alongside the commit: the transcript, prompts, files touched, token usage, tool calls and more. This thread is extremely negative - if you can't see the value in this, I don't know what to tell you.

Sure... you `git add` the context text generated by AI and `git commit` it, could be useful. Is that worth 60 million?

They raised 60 million. The investors think it’s worth 600M+

Re: Ex-GitHub CEO launches a new developer platform for AI agents

#283

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I didn’t say essentially all software is vibe coded. You already agree with me that it’s very good at some range of common tasks.

There are other things very good "at some range of common tasks". For example, stackoverflow snippets, libraries, bash spaghetti and even some no-code/low-code tools.

ok

Re: Ex-GitHub CEO launches a new developer platform for AI agents

#284

> Checkpoints are a new primitive that automatically captures agent context as first-class, versioned data in Git. When you commit code generated by an agent, Checkpoints capture the full session alongside the commit: the transcript, prompts, files touched, token usage, tool calls and more. This thread is extremely negative - if you can't see the value in this, I don't know what to tell you.

I know about "the entire developer world has been refactored" and all, but what exactly does this thing do?

Runs git checkpoint every time an agent makes changes?

Re: Ex-GitHub CEO launches a new developer platform for AI agents

#286
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've long wished for a 'filter' feature for the hn feed -- namely the old trend of web3 slop -- but with little else than keywords to filter, it would likely be tedious and inaccurate. Ironically, I think with AI/LLMs it could be a little easier to analyze.

one technique i've found useful is i don't click on the link if i'm not interested.

it's very effective.

and there's even a "hide" link.

Re: Ex-GitHub CEO launches a new developer platform for AI agents

#287

> Checkpoints are a new primitive that automatically captures agent context as first-class, versioned data in Git. When you commit code generated by an agent, Checkpoints capture the full session alongside the commit: the transcript, prompts, files touched, token usage, tool calls and more. This thread is extremely negative - if you can't see the value in this, I don't know what to tell you.

A year ago I added memory to my Emacs helper [0]. It was just lines in org-mode. I thought it was so stupid. It worked though. Sort of.

That's how a trillion dollar company also does it, turns out.

0: https://github.com/karthink/gptel

Re: Ex-GitHub CEO launches a new developer platform for AI agents

#288
The thread is missing the forest for the trees. The interesting bet here isn't git checkpoints—it's that someone is finally building the observability layer for agent-generated code.

Most agent frameworks (LangChain, Swarm, etc.) obsessed over orchestration. But the actual pain point isn't "how do I chain prompts"—it's "what did the agent do, why, and how do I audit/reproduce it?"

The markdown-files-in-git crowd is right that simple approaches work. But they work at small scale. Once you have multiple agents across multiple sessions generating code in production, you hit the same observability problems every other distributed system hits: tracing, attribution, debugging failures across runs.

The $60M question is whether that problem is big enough to justify a platform vs. teams bolting on their own logging. I'm skeptical—but the underlying insight (agent observability > agent orchestration) seems directionally correct.

Re: Ex-GitHub CEO launches a new developer platform for AI agents

#289

> Checkpoints are a new primitive that automatically captures agent context as first-class, versioned data in Git. When you commit code generated by an agent, Checkpoints capture the full session alongside the commit: the transcript, prompts, files touched, token usage, tool calls and more. This thread is extremely negative - if you can't see the value in this, I don't know what to tell you.

This is literally what claude code already does minus the commit attachment. It’s just very fancy marketing speak for the exact same thing.

I’m happy to believe maybe they’ll make something useful with 60M (quite a lot for a seed round though), but Maybe not get all lyrical about what they have now.

Re: Ex-GitHub CEO launches a new developer platform for AI agents

#290

The thread is missing the forest for the trees. The interesting bet here isn't git checkpoints—it's that someone is finally building the observability layer for agent-generated code. Most agent frameworks (LangChain, Swarm, etc.) obsessed over orchestration. But the actual pain point isn't "how do I chain prompts"—it's "what did the agent do, why, and how do I audit/reproduce it?" The markdown-files-in-git crowd is r…

It's not this, it's that?
Post reply on HN