Earlier quoted context omitted.
The 1M context is not available via subscription - only via API usage
Well this is extremely disappointing to say the least.
Claude Opus 4.6
131–140 of 1001 posts
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#132Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
Amateur. Opus 4.6 this afternoon built me a startup that identifies developers who aren’t embracing AI fully, liquifies them and sells the produce for $5/gallon. Software Engineering is over!
Bringing me back to slashdot, this thread
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#134Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#135($10/$37.50 per million input/output tokens) oof
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#136Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#137This is huge. It only came out 8 minutes ago but I was already able to bootstrap a 12k per month revenue SaaS startup!
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#138Does anyone with more insight into the AI/LLM industry happen to know if the cost to run them in normal user-workflows is falling? The reason I'm asking is because "agent teams" while a cool concept, it largely constrained by the economics of running multiple LLM agents (i.e. plans/API calls that make this practical at scale are expensive). A year or more ago, I read that both Anthropic and OpenAI were losing money o…
This gets repeated everywhere but I don't think it's true.
The company is unprofitable overall, but I don't see any reason to believe that their per-token inference costs are below the marginal cost of computing those tokens.
It is true that the company is unprofitable overall when you account for R&D spend, compensation, training, and everything else. This is a deliberate choice that every heavily funded startup should be making, otherwise you're wasting the investment money. That's precisely what the investment money is for.
However I don't think using their API and paying for tokens has negative value for the company. We can compare to models like DeepSeek where providers can charge a fraction of the price of OpenAI tokens and still be profitable. OpenAI's inference costs are going to be higher, but they're charging such a high premium that it's hard to believe they're losing money on each token sold. I think every token paid for moves them incrementally closer to profitability, not away from it.
Re: Claude Opus 4.6
#139Hmm all leaks had said this would be Claude 5. Wonder if it was a last minute demotion due to performance. Would explain the few days' delay as well.