Live data from Hacker News

A case study in PDF forensics: The Epstein PDFs

pdfa.org

201–210 of 254 posts

Re: A case study in PDF forensics: The Epstein PDFs

#201
post #52

> Information leakage may also be occurring via PDF comments or orphaned objects inside compressed object streams, as I discovered above. hopefully someone is independently archiving all documents my understanding is that some are being removed

Reddit is also removing and shadowbannig such posts, but there's a community on https://lemmy.world/post/42440468

What interest would Reddit have in suppressing the backup of official, public, government document releases?

Re: A case study in PDF forensics: The Epstein PDFs

#203
post #105
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What is the legal basis for releasing the someone's private files and communications? An act of congress, for one. Also, AFAIK, federal privacy generally ends at death, as does criminal liability; so releasing government files from a federal investigation after death of the subject is generally within the realm of acceptable conduct.

Yes, I forgot about that major part of the story! Still, acts of Congress can't violate Consitutional rights. It seems unlikely you lose all rights when you die or it would be chaos - imagine all the secrets people die with that affect everyone they know. An integral part of every estate plan would be incinerating records. Wills do have real power.

In my late teens, I worked as a bill collector. If I suspected an account owner was deceased, I'd call the Social Security Administration and ask them if they had a certificate of death on file. If they didn't, they'd tell me they couldn't comment. If they did, they'd say so, because dead people don't have a right to privacy.

Re: A case study in PDF forensics: The Epstein PDFs

#204
post #182

I found this part interesting: There are also other documents that appear to simulate a scanned document but completely lack the “real-world noise” expected with physical paper-based workflows. The much crisper images appear almost perfect without random artifacts or background noise, and with the exact same amount of image skew across multiple pages. Thanks to the borders around each page of text, page skew can easi…

Such a weird way to do it when it would be a vastly easier to just blow the document out to paper and re-scan it.

[dead]

Re: A case study in PDF forensics: The Epstein PDFs

#205
post #144

Has anyone analysed JE's writing style and looked for matches in archived 4chan posts or content from similar platforms? Same with Ghislaine, there should be enough data to identify them atp right? I don't buy the MaxwellHill claims for various reasons but it doesn't mean there's nothing to find.

There was a post on here about a project in stylometry that analyzed HN users comment history. The tool helped find accounts that had an extremely similar writing style to a given account. The site was soon removed due to privacy concerns but many users with multiple account attested to its accuracy https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33755016 It turns out stylometry is actually a pretty well-developed field. It mak…

I remember using one of these tools and it falsely identified some other account as being mine. Of course, I only have just this account.

Re: A case study in PDF forensics: The Epstein PDFs

#206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yet this was released under their term and not previous presidential terms

> previous presidential terms Term, not plural. There was one (1) interceding administration following Epstein's death. Trump promised that the Epstein files would be released if he was reelected, and then withheld files. Congress passed a bill remediating this, hence the newer tranche of files: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epstein_Files_Transparency_Act

Im not too deep into USA politics and have very very bad memory so i dont remember how it went down. The Wikipedia article you linked says it was signed by trump.

>and then withheld files.

So did he sign that willingly in the end? Did he have to sign it? Did he cave because he said publicly he would?

Re: A case study in PDF forensics: The Epstein PDFs

#207
post #62
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He met with moot ("he is sensitive, be gentile", search on jmail), and within a few days the /pol/ board got created, starting a culture war in the US, leading to Trump getting elected president. Absolutely nuts.

Just to substantiate this a bit: I remember a gleeful consensus in certain circles being that /pol/ and /r/the_donald had "memed Trump into the White House". It's much more complicated than that, but there's certainly an element of truth there.

https://www.wired.com/story/dale-beran-it-came-from-somethin...

This is a good book about it.

Re: A case study in PDF forensics: The Epstein PDFs

#208
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reddit is also removing and shadowbannig such posts, but there's a community on https://lemmy.world/post/42440468

What interest would Reddit have in suppressing the backup of official, public, government document releases?

FWIW https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/r45a5n/here_is_...

Take with a grain of salt, obviously.

Re: A case study in PDF forensics: The Epstein PDFs

#209
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Depending on their technical capability, yes. I mean even in this thread you got what are essentially one-liners to do it. Definitely less hassle then doing it irl

I know I'm not the brightest bulb by any measure, but do some people really take less than at least a few minutes to come up with one-liners for problems as novel as graphical transformations to PDFs? Maybe if the presumed techie hacker / federal worker took it as an amusing challenge I could see this being done, but genuinely out of pure laziness? That's incredible if true.

There is nothing novel about it. I saw at least one person say that they have done exactly the same thing out of laziness.

Re: A case study in PDF forensics: The Epstein PDFs

#210

Has anyone analysed JE's writing style and looked for matches in archived 4chan posts or content from similar platforms? Same with Ghislaine, there should be enough data to identify them atp right? I don't buy the MaxwellHill claims for various reasons but it doesn't mean there's nothing to find.

The writing style is rather interesting. Epstein seems borderline dyslexic, but almost none of the emails I've seen are written in a coherent way, regardless of the sender. Either people on that level rarely write anything on their own and have completely forgotten how to construct proper sentences or maybe that just how they communicate. Sort of language internal to the group.

I haven't looked at the files, nor followed the technical analysis much, but in case you missed it, some of that incoherency may be a processing glitch discussed a couple of days ago.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46868759

Post reply on HN