wow, it's way more expensive than the nexus 7. $330 vs $200 for the bottom.
iPad mini
31–40 of 358 posts
Re: iPad mini
#32The resolution, they are putting retina displays in macbook pros but launch a tablet with non-retina display. Why?
Meh, 164 PPI isn't bad, and this resolution allows them to run legacy iPad applications unscaled.
The original android g1 had greater PPI (180) than this thing.
Re: iPad mini
#33How underwhelming. At 7.9 inches, it’s perfectly sized to deliver an experience every bit as big as iPad What does that even mean? Either it's perfectly sized, and the iPad is the wrong size. Or it's not. There can surely only be one perfect size to deliver an iPad experience??? Either it's 10" or it's 7.9". I think Apple's marketing has always been the same - it's just that for a while they were ahead of the curve a…
Re: iPad mini
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple competes on user experience. Not price, and certainly not specs.
The poor specs lead to a poor UX, so I fail to see the difference.
I, personally, would buy the Kindle Fire. Most people, however, will buy the iPad Mini. Bigger price and all.
Curiously enough, I think the iPad 2 has just become the most compelling tablet in the market in terms of price/specs/performance. I'm wondering if iPad 2 will eat into sells of the new iPads? And would Apple care?
Anyway, interesting times.
Re: iPad mini
#35How underwhelming. At 7.9 inches, it’s perfectly sized to deliver an experience every bit as big as iPad What does that even mean? Either it's perfectly sized, and the iPad is the wrong size. Or it's not. There can surely only be one perfect size to deliver an iPad experience??? Either it's 10" or it's 7.9". I think Apple's marketing has always been the same - it's just that for a while they were ahead of the curve a…
Re: iPad mini
#36On the plus side for the N7, they screwed up on price though - for the ecosystem and build quality advantage may be a $50 premium would have been attractive esp for lesser screen resolution and older CPU/GPU. The N7 also feels like it should be more single hand friendly than the iPad mini.
Re: iPad mini
#37Re: iPad mini
#38The resolution, they are putting retina displays in macbook pros but launch a tablet with non-retina display. Why?
Re: iPad mini
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple competes on user experience. Not price, and certainly not specs.
The poor specs lead to a poor UX, so I fail to see the difference.
Re: iPad mini
#40Someone invent a screen that can change size already, sheesh.
a folding screen would be good. especially if the underside was also an eInk display