All these tools to build something, but nothing to build. I feel like I am part of a Pyramid Scheme where every product is about building something else, but nothing reaches the end user. Note: nothing against fluid.sh, I am struggling to figure out something to build.
When there’s a gold rush, sell shovels.
Claude Code for Infrastructure
131–140 of 190 posts
Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure
#132All these tools to build something, but nothing to build. I feel like I am part of a Pyramid Scheme where every product is about building something else, but nothing reaches the end user. Note: nothing against fluid.sh, I am struggling to figure out something to build.
Talk to people. There are an infinite amount of problems to solve. Deciding whether they’re worth solving is the hard part.
Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure
#133All these tools to build something, but nothing to build. I feel like I am part of a Pyramid Scheme where every product is about building something else, but nothing reaches the end user. Note: nothing against fluid.sh, I am struggling to figure out something to build.
To summarize: Everyone wants to automate stuff. Most people do not want to touch boring, large problems.
Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure
#134Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure
#135All these tools to build something, but nothing to build. I feel like I am part of a Pyramid Scheme where every product is about building something else, but nothing reaches the end user. Note: nothing against fluid.sh, I am struggling to figure out something to build.
Steve Jobs used to say every product needs a killer feature AI is a product in search of a killer feature First AGI was anyday going to come. Gpt5 had showed intelligence apparently Then got started adult chat with paying customers
Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is my belief with some exceptions it is almost always easier to teach a domain expert to code than it is to teach a software developer the domain.
For problems that can be solved with only a small amount of simple code that is true. However software can become very complex and the larger/more complex the problem is the more important software developers are. It quickly becomes easier to teach software developers enough of your domain than to teach domain experts software. In a complex project the hard parts about software are harder than the hard parts about th…
Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
It should be. This is the least friction way to do so as server Linux operating systems still have not agreed on a common application format / package manager.
> It should be. This is the least friction way to do so as server Linux operating systems still have not agreed on a common application format / package manager. Nowhere in your response did you mention security.
Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
wow, you downvoted me. this is still devops. we use cloud-init to setup the vm. i run the underlying hardware infrastructure and we've automated the provisioning such that we have an api that can start/stop compute at will. even bare metal. the point of this is that the current $/token model is awful, especially if you're using a lot of tokens. it should be $/minute. pay for what you use.
tokens are a rough proxy for usage over time, so I am paying for what I use, less than running a TPU pod myself, required for the models I use, i.e. I don't saturate the compute so it's cheaper to pay-go
Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
wow, you downvoted me. this is still devops. we use cloud-init to setup the vm. i run the underlying hardware infrastructure and we've automated the provisioning such that we have an api that can start/stop compute at will. even bare metal. the point of this is that the current $/token model is awful, especially if you're using a lot of tokens. it should be $/minute. pay for what you use.
tokens are a rough proxy for usage over time, so I am paying for what I use, less than running a TPU pod myself, required for the models I use, i.e. I don't saturate the compute so it's cheaper to pay-go
Re: Claude Code for Infrastructure
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
wow, you downvoted me. this is still devops. we use cloud-init to setup the vm. i run the underlying hardware infrastructure and we've automated the provisioning such that we have an api that can start/stop compute at will. even bare metal. the point of this is that the current $/token model is awful, especially if you're using a lot of tokens. it should be $/minute. pay for what you use.
tokens are a rough proxy for usage over time, so I am paying for what I use, less than running a TPU pod myself, required for the models I use, i.e. I don't saturate the compute so it's cheaper to pay-go