OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
jakequist.com
OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
1–10 of 440 posts
Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#2Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#3Why is Apple's hardware being in demand for a use that undermines its non-Chinese competition a sign of missing the ball versus validation for waiting and seeing?
Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#4Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#5Expensive and overhyped?
Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#6Are people's agents actually clicking buttons (visual computer use) or is this just a metaphor?
I'm not asking if CU exists, but rather is this literally the driver of people's workflows? I thought everyone is just running Ralph loops in CC.
For an article making such a bold technological/social claim about a trillion dollar company, this seems a strange thing to be hand wavey about.
Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#7> An AI agent that clicks buttons. Are people's agents actually clicking buttons (visual computer use) or is this just a metaphor? I'm not asking if CU exists, but rather is this literally the driver of people's workflows? I thought everyone is just running Ralph loops in CC. For an article making such a bold technological/social claim about a trillion dollar company, this seems a strange thing to be hand wavey about…
Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#8> An AI agent that clicks buttons. Are people's agents actually clicking buttons (visual computer use) or is this just a metaphor? I'm not asking if CU exists, but rather is this literally the driver of people's workflows? I thought everyone is just running Ralph loops in CC. For an article making such a bold technological/social claim about a trillion dollar company, this seems a strange thing to be hand wavey about…
Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#9> An AI agent that clicks buttons. Are people's agents actually clicking buttons (visual computer use) or is this just a metaphor? I'm not asking if CU exists, but rather is this literally the driver of people's workflows? I thought everyone is just running Ralph loops in CC. For an article making such a bold technological/social claim about a trillion dollar company, this seems a strange thing to be hand wavey about…
Https://heyblue.com does, very helpful for people with disabilities or when driving.
Re: OpenClaw is what Apple intelligence should have been
#10And this is probably coming, a few years from now. Because remember, Apple doesn't usually invent new products. It takes proven ones and then makes its own much nicer version.
Let other companies figure out the model. Let the industry figure out how to make it secure. Then Apple can integrate it with hardware and software in a way no other company can.
Right now we are still in very, very, very early days.