Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Minikv – Distributed key-value and object store in Rust (Raft, S3 API)

github.com

11–20 of 40 posts

Re: Show HN: Minikv – Distributed key-value and object store in Rust (Raft, S3 API)

#11
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>All the code, architecture, logic, and design in minikv were written by me, 100% by hand. Why people always lie with this? Especially in this case that they uploaded the entire log: Date: Sat Dec 6 16:08:04 2025 +0100 Add hashing utilities and consistent hash ring Date: Sat Dec 6 16:07:24 2025 +0100 Create mod.rs for common utilities in minikv Date: Sat Dec 6 16:07:03 2025 +0100 Add configuration structures for mini…

You have never split your working tree changes into separate commits?

Irrelevant question. In README has:

>Built in public as a learning-by-doing project

So, either the entire project was already written and being uploaded one file at the time (first modification since lowest commit mentioned is README update: https://github.com/whispem/minikv/commit/6fa48be1187f596dde8..., clearly AI generated and clearly AI used has codebase/architecture knowledge), and this claim is false, or they're implementing a new component every 30s.

Re: Show HN: Minikv – Distributed key-value and object store in Rust (Raft, S3 API)

#12
post #6

Last posted 16 days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46661308

Yes, I know. I had the opportunity to request a review of my first post (which was flagged) following my email to the moderators of HN. After checking, the moderator told me to redo a post because indeed I was wrongly flagged by some people here.

Re: Show HN: Minikv – Distributed key-value and object store in Rust (Raft, S3 API)

#13
post #9

Hello, cool project, did you think about maybe contributing to the key-value store feature of Garage, which is also a Rust project by open source development lab Deux Fleurs?

Hello! Thank you for your message. I don’t know this project, do you have a GitHub link maybe?

Re: Show HN: Minikv – Distributed key-value and object store in Rust (Raft, S3 API)

#14
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You have never split your working tree changes into separate commits?

Irrelevant question. In README has: >Built in public as a learning-by-doing project So, either the entire project was already written and being uploaded one file at the time (first modification since lowest commit mentioned is README update: https://github.com/whispem/minikv/commit/6fa48be1187f596dde8... , clearly AI generated and clearly AI used has codebase/architecture knowledge), and this claim is false, or they'…

I am not going to pretend to know what this person did, but I've definitely modified many things at once and made distinct commits after the fact (within 30s). I do not find it that abnormal.

Re: Show HN: Minikv – Distributed key-value and object store in Rust (Raft, S3 API)

#15
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You have never split your working tree changes into separate commits?

Irrelevant question. In README has: >Built in public as a learning-by-doing project So, either the entire project was already written and being uploaded one file at the time (first modification since lowest commit mentioned is README update: https://github.com/whispem/minikv/commit/6fa48be1187f596dde8... , clearly AI generated and clearly AI used has codebase/architecture knowledge), and this claim is false, or they'…

I had the opportunity to request a review of my first post (which was flagged) following my email to the moderators of HN. I didn’t use AI for the codebase, only for .md files & there's no problem with that. My project was reviewed by moderators, don't worry. If the codebase or architecture was AI generated this post would not have been authorized and therefore it would not have been published.

Re: Show HN: Minikv – Distributed key-value and object store in Rust (Raft, S3 API)

#16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Irrelevant question. In README has: >Built in public as a learning-by-doing project So, either the entire project was already written and being uploaded one file at the time (first modification since lowest commit mentioned is README update: https://github.com/whispem/minikv/commit/6fa48be1187f596dde8... , clearly AI generated and clearly AI used has codebase/architecture knowledge), and this claim is false, or they'…

I am not going to pretend to know what this person did, but I've definitely modified many things at once and made distinct commits after the fact (within 30s). I do not find it that abnormal.

Thanks a lot! I make distinct commits "every 30s" because I'm focused and I test my project. If the CI is green, I don't touch of anything. If not, I work on the project until the CI is fully green.

Re: Show HN: Minikv – Distributed key-value and object store in Rust (Raft, S3 API)

#17
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Irrelevant question. In README has: >Built in public as a learning-by-doing project So, either the entire project was already written and being uploaded one file at the time (first modification since lowest commit mentioned is README update: https://github.com/whispem/minikv/commit/6fa48be1187f596dde8... , clearly AI generated and clearly AI used has codebase/architecture knowledge), and this claim is false, or they'…

I had the opportunity to request a review of my first post (which was flagged) following my email to the moderators of HN. I didn’t use AI for the codebase, only for .md files & there's no problem with that. My project was reviewed by moderators, don't worry. If the codebase or architecture was AI generated this post would not have been authorized and therefore it would not have been published.

How does this deleted fix_everything.sh fit in to your story?

https://github.com/whispem/minikv/commit/6e01d29365f345283ec...

Re: Show HN: Minikv – Distributed key-value and object store in Rust (Raft, S3 API)

#18
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Irrelevant question. In README has: >Built in public as a learning-by-doing project So, either the entire project was already written and being uploaded one file at the time (first modification since lowest commit mentioned is README update: https://github.com/whispem/minikv/commit/6fa48be1187f596dde8... , clearly AI generated and clearly AI used has codebase/architecture knowledge), and this claim is false, or they'…

I had the opportunity to request a review of my first post (which was flagged) following my email to the moderators of HN. I didn’t use AI for the codebase, only for .md files & there's no problem with that. My project was reviewed by moderators, don't worry. If the codebase or architecture was AI generated this post would not have been authorized and therefore it would not have been published.

I thought that your “background in literature” contributed to the “well-written docs”, but that was LLMs!

Re: Show HN: Minikv – Distributed key-value and object store in Rust (Raft, S3 API)

#19
post #17
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I had the opportunity to request a review of my first post (which was flagged) following my email to the moderators of HN. I didn’t use AI for the codebase, only for .md files & there's no problem with that. My project was reviewed by moderators, don't worry. If the codebase or architecture was AI generated this post would not have been authorized and therefore it would not have been published.

How does this deleted fix_everything.sh fit in to your story? https://github.com/whispem/minikv/commit/6e01d29365f345283ec...

I don't see the problem to be honest

Re: Show HN: Minikv – Distributed key-value and object store in Rust (Raft, S3 API)

#20
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I had the opportunity to request a review of my first post (which was flagged) following my email to the moderators of HN. I didn’t use AI for the codebase, only for .md files & there's no problem with that. My project was reviewed by moderators, don't worry. If the codebase or architecture was AI generated this post would not have been authorized and therefore it would not have been published.

I thought that your “background in literature” contributed to the “well-written docs”, but that was LLMs!

No, I was helped (.md files only) by AI to rewrite but the majority of the doc is written by myself, I just asked for help from the AI for formatting for example.
Post reply on HN