It uses phase change (solid to liquid) to store heat at about 200 kJ/kg. Compare this to heating water in a boiler from 10c to 60c - stores 209 kJ/kg. So we already have an effective way to store heat which can work for decades without servicing and is also cheap to produce (in terms of money and energy consumption).
What about heat per unit of volume? Seems like the selling point is that a pretty small box can service a whole bathroom. Presumably it has a higher density than water and requires less insulation?
Pretty soon, heat pumps will be able to store and distribute heat as needed
181–190 of 243 posts
Re: Pretty soon, heat pumps will be able to store and distribute heat as needed
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
But dumping the waste cold air into the house when it's below 0C outside doesn't make much sense either.
You already dump waste hot air into your kitchen from the refrigerator during the summer. Is this much different? It does seem a little silly to have these chains of heat pumps all working in various directions. I read about "cold district heat" in a sibling comment which circulated lukewarm water to use as a heat sink or source with heat pumps. Maybe something similar could be done with a water or refrigerant loop t…
Now, this is of course no concern in the "my water heater is in my attic or attached garage" parts of the country such regulations come from...
Re: Pretty soon, heat pumps will be able to store and distribute heat as needed
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
Certainly not gas or oil, which are still cheaper to heat with than heat pumps.
Modern heat pumps are cheaper than oil for heating just about everywhere. They're cheaper than natural gas in most places, unless electricity prices where you live are particularly high.
I have a heat pump btw., with COP 4.5 (below ground). Costs me EUR 2.5 - 3k per year to heat the house.
Re: Pretty soon, heat pumps will be able to store and distribute heat as needed
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
in CA my natural gas is far cheaper than the heat pump sadly
In western europe today, I spend €10+ per day to heat my home (17 degrees mind you) with a gas powered boiler for radiators. I can run my mini-split on 18 degrees all day for a couple of euros. I moved here from the US in 2022 right after the full scale invasion of Ukraine so natural gas prices skyrocketed overnight. I don't really understand what the aversion is to forced air climate control here other than "it's no…
Re: Pretty soon, heat pumps will be able to store and distribute heat as needed
#185Earlier quoted context omitted.
Certainly not gas or oil, which are still cheaper to heat with than heat pumps.
Hm? Around here oil was never been in the same (low) order of magnitude. Those who installed oil heaters many decades ago regretted it quickly. And it's been illegal to use them for a couple of decades as well now. Gas has never been an option in my region, there's no infrastructure for that. We have used gas in Japan until now, but even that we'll be phasing out (I live in two places)
That really depends on the oil heater, no? You can't compare a heater from the 70s with a modern one. That's like saying I don't drive modern cars because cars in the 70s were unsafe and stank.
Re: Pretty soon, heat pumps will be able to store and distribute heat as needed
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
Certainly not gas or oil, which are still cheaper to heat with than heat pumps.
Oil heating has usually been the most expensive way to heat in the UK, on par with resistive-electric.
Electricity (standard): 33.34 p/kWh
Heating oil (gas oil): 10.54 p/kWh
Kerosene: 6.20 p/kWh
Mains gas: 7.68 p/kWh
https://www.nottenergy.com/advice-and-tools/project-energy-c...
Re: Pretty soon, heat pumps will be able to store and distribute heat as needed
#187Earlier quoted context omitted.
it also reduces peak load - you can heat water up slower with a lower powered heater. I have a 35 liter warm water tank in my garden shed that pulls about 3.5kw - an equivalent on demand heater would need 14kw or more.
I don't see why that matters. You use the same amount of energy and the demand is smoothed out at grid scale (yes I know about tea in ad breaks).
If you have your own solar ( either direct solar water heating, or solar electricity generation ), the hot water tank is a simple, cheap, reliable energy store.
Sure capacity isn't that great - but pretty much every house in the UK used to have one, so it adds up.
Re: Pretty soon, heat pumps will be able to store and distribute heat as needed
#188Earlier quoted context omitted.
Indeed. In the UK there was a unfortunate trend of ripping out these energy storage devices and replacing hot water tanks with on demand electric hot water heating ( only heat the water you need ). And new builds often have no tanks ( as it saves space in the new tiny homes ). Very short sighted in my view - a very simple way to store energy and everyone uses hot water directly.
They don't work well with heat pumps. Heat pumps lose efficiency as the differential increases, so if you try to store heat in a tank, you quickly drop capacity and efficiency. Versus resistance, which is exactly as efficient at 0°C and 1000°C, and why those storage heaters used to make sense. (And storage is directly proportional to temperature differential above interior ambient)
It is true that heat pumps coefficient of performance drops as the output temperature increases. So you need a proportionally larger hot water tank to store the same amount of energy. So it is fair to say there are tradeoffs. But hot water storage is still a necessary part of most heat pump installs - because peak output of heat pumps tends to be below the heat demand of showers.
Re: Pretty soon, heat pumps will be able to store and distribute heat as needed
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
They don't work well with heat pumps. Heat pumps lose efficiency as the differential increases, so if you try to store heat in a tank, you quickly drop capacity and efficiency. Versus resistance, which is exactly as efficient at 0°C and 1000°C, and why those storage heaters used to make sense. (And storage is directly proportional to temperature differential above interior ambient)
Isn't it better to heat the water up to a point (let's say 40 or 50 degrees) and to heat it the rest of the way with resistance heating? >Versus resistance, which is exactly as efficient at 0°C and 1000°C It isn't. The difference is smaller than for a heatpump tho obviously.
Where does the energy go then?
Re: Pretty soon, heat pumps will be able to store and distribute heat as needed
#190Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see why that matters. You use the same amount of energy and the demand is smoothed out at grid scale (yes I know about tea in ad breaks).
Houses in the UK typically have 100A supply and the whole local grid is sized assuming people use relatively small amounts of electricity. If everyone gets an electric car and a massive heat pump, lots of local transmission will need upgrading
One interesting case where "at the same time" actually does happen is overnight car charging. Some chargers are configured to start charging exactly when a cheaper tariff kicks in, which causes big transient issues for the grid. I think modern chargers have a random delay to help with that.