91–100 of 671 posts
Does anybody know when Codex is going to roll out subagent support? That has been an absolute game changer in Claude Code. It lets me run with a single session for so much longer and chip away at much more complex tasks. This was my biggest pain point when I used Codex last week.
- looks like OpenAIs answer to Claude Code Desktop / Cowork - workspace agent runner apps (like Conductor) get more and more obsolete - "vibe working" is becoming a thing - people use folder based agents to do their work (not just coding) - new workflows seem to be evolving into folder based workspaces, where agents can self-configure MCP servers and skills + memory files and instructions kinda interested to see if o…
Also interesting that they are both only for macOS. I’m feeling a bit left out on the Windows and Linux side, but this seems like an ongoing trend.
linux / windows requires extra testing as well as some adjustments to the software stack (e.g. liquid glass only works on mac); to get the thing out the door ASAP, they release macos first.
> "Localize my app and add the option to change units" To me this still feels like the wrong way to interact with a coding agent. Does this lead people to success? I've never seen it not go off the rails in some way unless you provide clear boundaries as to what the scope of the expected change is. It's gonna write code if you don't even want it to yet, it's gonna write the test first or the logic first, whichever yo…
The better models can handle that prompt assuming there is an existing clean codebase and the scope of the task is not too large. The existing code can act as an implicit boundary. Weaker models give your experience, or when using a 100% LLM codebase I think it can end up in a hall of mirrors. Now I have an idea to try, have a 2nd LLM processing pass that normalizes the vibe-code to some personal style and standard t…
Bugs me they treat MacOS as first class. Do people actually develop on a Mac in 2026? Why not just start with Linux?
Looks like another Claude App/Cowork-type competitor with slightly different tradeoffs (Cowork just calls Claude Code in a VM, this just calls Codex CLI with OS sandboxing). Here's the Codex tech stack in case anyone was interested like me. Framework: Electron 40.0.0 Frontend: - React 19.2.0 - Jotai (state management) - TanStack React Form - Vite (bundler) - TypeScript Backend/Main Process: - Node.js - better-sqlite3…
Wow, this is nearly an exact copy of Codex Monitor[1]: voice mode, project + threads/agents, git panel, PR button, terminal drawer, IDE integrations, local/worktree/cloud edits, archiving threads, etc. [1] https://github.com/Dimillian/CodexMonitor
Codex Monitor seems like an Antigravity Agent Manager clone. It came out after, too. Bunch of the features u listed were already in the codex extension too. False outrage it its finest.
I'm a Claude Code user primarily. The best UI based orchestrator I've used is Zenflow by Zencoder.ai -- I am in no way affiliated with them, but their UI / tool can connect to any model or service you have. They offer their own model but I've not used it. What I like is that the sessions are highly configurable from their plan.md which translates a md document into a process. So you can tweak and add steps. This is s…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Codex Monitor seems like an Antigravity Agent Manager clone. It came out after, too. Bunch of the features u listed were already in the codex extension too. False outrage it its finest.
I have both Codex Monitor and this new Codex app open side by side right now; aside from the theme, I struggle to tell them apart. Antigravity's Agent Manager is obviously different, but these two are twins.