Everyone knows about emdashes, but there are so much more! Here is a wiki article with all common tell-tales of AI writing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing
Students using “humanizer” programs to beat accusations of cheating with AI
11–20 of 91 posts
Re: Students using “humanizer” programs to beat accusations of cheating with AI
#12At some point, writing 2 sentences by hand will become more acceptable than this.
Re: Students using “humanizer” programs to beat accusations of cheating with AI
#13Everyone knows about emdashes, but there are so much more! Here is a wiki article with all common tell-tales of AI writing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing
I used em dashes heavily 15 years ago when writing my PhD thesis.
Re: Students using “humanizer” programs to beat accusations of cheating with AI
#14Re: Students using “humanizer” programs to beat accusations of cheating with AI
#15I'm guessing this "humanizer" actually does two things: * grep to remove em dashes and emojis * re-run through another llm with a prompt to remove excessive sycophantry and invalid url citations
You’re absolutely right! Ha. Every time an AI passionately agrees with me, after I’ve given it criticism, I’m always 10x more skeptical of the quality of the work.
Re: Students using “humanizer” programs to beat accusations of cheating with AI
#16[flagged]
Re: Students using “humanizer” programs to beat accusations of cheating with AI
#17It's how it was with the internet. I grew up in the 90s, and teacher didn't know how to deal with the fact we no longer had to go through multiple books in the library to get the information they needed. We barely needed to write it.
Now nobody expects students to not use the internet. Same here: teachers must accept that AI can and will write papers and answer questions / do homework. How you test student must be reinvented.
Re: Students using “humanizer” programs to beat accusations of cheating with AI
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
You’re absolutely right! Ha. Every time an AI passionately agrees with me, after I’ve given it criticism, I’m always 10x more skeptical of the quality of the work.
Why? The AI is just regurgitating tokens (including the sycophancy). Don't anthropomorphise it.
Re: Students using “humanizer” programs to beat accusations of cheating with AI
#19This ship has sailed. It's how it was with the internet. I grew up in the 90s, and teacher didn't know how to deal with the fact we no longer had to go through multiple books in the library to get the information they needed. We barely needed to write it. Now nobody expects students to not use the internet. Same here: teachers must accept that AI can and will write papers and answer questions / do homework. How you t…
Re: Students using “humanizer” programs to beat accusations of cheating with AI
#20Everyone knows about emdashes, but there are so much more! Here is a wiki article with all common tell-tales of AI writing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing
There are no clear signs, at least for anyone who cares to hide them