Live data from Hacker News

Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

yle.fi

1–10 of 593 posts

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#2
"FISTA has taken advantage of the law change, brought in last August, which allows schools to restrict or completely ban the use of mobile phones during school hours."

I find it interesting that a law change was needed to allow schools to do this.

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#3

" FISTA has taken advantage of the law change, brought in last August, which allows schools to restrict or completely ban the use of mobile phones during school hours. " I find it interesting that a law change was needed to allow schools to do this.

Yeah if in the 80s they had to change a law to prevent children from taking their TV to school, everybody would be scratching their heads.

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#4

" FISTA has taken advantage of the law change, brought in last August, which allows schools to restrict or completely ban the use of mobile phones during school hours. " I find it interesting that a law change was needed to allow schools to do this.

Students do have rights - and indeed also property rights - here. Of course, when in class the students could be asked to bring their phones to the front and be given them back afterwards, but without the law, the use of phones couldn't be restricted during breaks etc. Thus the new law which can make the restrictions even more severe during school hours.

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#6
I'm fine with this, as long as they DO NOT require any form of ID or 'age' verification.

Instead this should be attacked from the profit side, by banning any form of advertising which might target children. If there's no profit to be made in servicing said demographic and a law requesting at least end user 'agreement' that they are an adult, this should be sufficient.

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#7
post #6

I'm fine with this, as long as they DO NOT require any form of ID or 'age' verification. Instead this should be attacked from the profit side, by banning any form of advertising which might target children. If there's no profit to be made in servicing said demographic and a law requesting at least end user 'agreement' that they are an adult, this should be sufficient.

Who decides whether an ad is targeting children or not?

I’m not playing devil’s advocate, I’m curious what the SOTA is for ad moderation. I’m sure it’s relatively easy to tell a kid’s toy ad from adult ones like alcohol, but how do you differentiate toy ads targeting parents vs toy ads targeting kids?

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#8
post #6

I'm fine with this, as long as they DO NOT require any form of ID or 'age' verification. Instead this should be attacked from the profit side, by banning any form of advertising which might target children. If there's no profit to be made in servicing said demographic and a law requesting at least end user 'agreement' that they are an adult, this should be sufficient.

Without age verification this is obviously an unenforceable ban... I think Finland already has schemes for age verification.

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#9
post #4

" FISTA has taken advantage of the law change, brought in last August, which allows schools to restrict or completely ban the use of mobile phones during school hours. " I find it interesting that a law change was needed to allow schools to do this.

Students do have rights - and indeed also property rights - here. Of course, when in class the students could be asked to bring their phones to the front and be given them back afterwards, but without the law, the use of phones couldn't be restricted during breaks etc. Thus the new law which can make the restrictions even more severe during school hours.

Of course people have rights... the point is that schools seem not allowed to set their own rules.

The school my children went to in the UK has had a no phone policy for many years: phones must be off and kept in the pupils' bags. No need for a law change...

I think this is about approach to regulation and flexibility. In general being too restrictive about what is allowed makes things inflexible and poor at adapting.

Re: Finland looks to introduce Australia-style ban on social media

#10
post #6

I'm fine with this, as long as they DO NOT require any form of ID or 'age' verification. Instead this should be attacked from the profit side, by banning any form of advertising which might target children. If there's no profit to be made in servicing said demographic and a law requesting at least end user 'agreement' that they are an adult, this should be sufficient.

Who decides whether an ad is targeting children or not? I’m not playing devil’s advocate, I’m curious what the SOTA is for ad moderation. I’m sure it’s relatively easy to tell a kid’s toy ad from adult ones like alcohol, but how do you differentiate toy ads targeting parents vs toy ads targeting kids?

>Who decides whether an ad is targeting children or not?

Much simpler than that, you just ban all targeted ads full stop end of story. The ad-funded internet existed in the 90s before ad targeting was a thing.

You went on a car forum, you'd get ads about car parts. You went on a PC forum, you'd get ads about PC parts. Pretty simple stuff that didn't need to know your age, gender, political affiliation, ovulation status, etc so it's not like the web will go bust without ad targeting.

Targeted ads are exploitative and manipulative, and a crime against humanity, or at least on society.

Post reply on HN