Live data from Hacker News

YouTube blocks background video playback on Brave and other browsers

piunikaweb.com

31–40 of 212 posts

Re: YouTube blocks background video playback on Brave and other browsers

#31

Newpipe remains one of the best solutions for background playback. They do tend to move pretty quickly to patch "fixes" that YouTube throw in now and again. It's also useful for video backups if you need to preserve them for any reason.

> It's also useful for video backups if you need to preserve them for any reason.

You can download only the soundpart as mp4 or opus too.

Re: YouTube blocks background video playback on Brave and other browsers

#32
What a shame. What's the point even? I'm not going subscribe to YouTube premium anyway, and even less install and use the YouTube app. What happens with this move is just that I will just use YouTube less. I believe that's the case for most people who chose to use YouTube in a browser precisely for background playback.

As an example: knowing that I won't be able to keep the sound playing for the 5 minutes in between two buses when I need to walk and pay attention, I'll probably just launch a podcast from the beginning of my hour of transportation so that I'm not interrupted. For these five minutes, they loose me for almost an hour.

Re: YouTube blocks background video playback on Brave and other browsers

#33
post #23

What a waste of resources. Imagine employing some of the most brilliant engineers on the planet and allocating man-hours towards artificially worsening the experience for your userbase in order to blackmail them into paying you, and giving them back what they had in the first place. At least this is a loosing game for Google, since this is client side behaviour.

Aren't they going to win in the long run with remote attestation?

Re: YouTube blocks background video playback on Brave and other browsers

#34
post #23

What a waste of resources. Imagine employing some of the most brilliant engineers on the planet and allocating man-hours towards artificially worsening the experience for your userbase in order to blackmail them into paying you, and giving them back what they had in the first place. At least this is a loosing game for Google, since this is client side behaviour.

*Allocating man-hours towards making sure that users actually pay for the service they're using, either via youtube subscription or ads

Re: YouTube blocks background video playback on Brave and other browsers

#35
post #19

Background playback is a feature of the browser and operating system, not YouTube. Consumer laws should prevent Google doing this. We need an anti-DMCA to make circumvention, bypassing, or disabling of user’s device or OS features illegal.

Serving requests is a feature of Youtube and if they don't want to serve your client... well you didn't pay for it anyway.

The equivalent here is if Sony owned the most watched TV network (by far) and decided that it would work fully on Sony Bravia tvs. People with LG or Samsung TV's could only watch a degraded version.

Re: YouTube blocks background video playback on Brave and other browsers

#36
post #32

What a shame. What's the point even? I'm not going subscribe to YouTube premium anyway, and even less install and use the YouTube app. What happens with this move is just that I will just use YouTube less. I believe that's the case for most people who chose to use YouTube in a browser precisely for background playback. As an example: knowing that I won't be able to keep the sound playing for the 5 minutes in between…

The point is that youtube is an ad-funded service, and if you're not watching the ads, Google is losing money on you.

Re: YouTube blocks background video playback on Brave and other browsers

#37

Imagine trying to take a basic browser function we’ve all taken for granted for decades and attempt to paywall it as ‘Background playback is a feature intended to be exclusive for YouTube Premium members.’ Get fucked. I vote we remove API access to any focus state information. Fuck you google.

It upsets me to see YouTube Premium apologists despite all the hostile moves by YouTube. YouTube Premium is an extortion scheme. When there are enough paying customers, YouTube Premium will begin showing ads to them. They won't forget sugarcoating ads as being “unobtrusive” or “environment-supporting” or whatever. But guess what? If you don't want to see them, you can upgrade to YouTube Premium Plus and continue bein…

> YouTube Premium is an extortion scheme.

One might also say it was unsustainable from the start, video is incredibly expensive to host and especially moderate.

All we're seeing right now is the beginning of the end of the ad-financed world. Someone has to pay the bills in the end and advertisement spending is on the way down, more and more of it is going to influencers/TTL instead of traditional ATL/BTL marketing.

Re: YouTube blocks background video playback on Brave and other browsers

#38
post #34
post #23

What a waste of resources. Imagine employing some of the most brilliant engineers on the planet and allocating man-hours towards artificially worsening the experience for your userbase in order to blackmail them into paying you, and giving them back what they had in the first place. At least this is a loosing game for Google, since this is client side behaviour.

*Allocating man-hours towards making sure that users actually pay for the service they're using, either via youtube subscription or ads

Monetizing a basic OS feature is not a good look.

Re: YouTube blocks background video playback on Brave and other browsers

#39

Newpipe remains one of the best solutions for background playback. They do tend to move pretty quickly to patch "fixes" that YouTube throw in now and again. It's also useful for video backups if you need to preserve them for any reason.

Why install additional software? Firefox hasn't broken for me only the Chrome clones.

Because modern websites are unusable on mobile; it's a feature and not a bug.

Re: YouTube blocks background video playback on Brave and other browsers

#40
post #34
post #23

What a waste of resources. Imagine employing some of the most brilliant engineers on the planet and allocating man-hours towards artificially worsening the experience for your userbase in order to blackmail them into paying you, and giving them back what they had in the first place. At least this is a loosing game for Google, since this is client side behaviour.

*Allocating man-hours towards making sure that users actually pay for the service they're using, either via youtube subscription or ads

Maybe if the Youtube subscription wasn't 10x what they earn from a single user with ads, that would be more believable option.
Post reply on HN