Live data from Hacker News

CISA’s acting head uploaded sensitive files into public version of ChatGPT

politico.com

51–60 of 264 posts

Re: CISA’s acting head uploaded sensitive files into public version of ChatGPT

#51

There have to be GovCloud only LLMs just for this case. I swear this government is headed by appointed nephews of appointed nephews. I keep thinking back about that Chernobyl miniseries; head of the science department used to run a shoe factory. No one needs to be competent at their job anymore

[deleted]

Re: CISA’s acting head uploaded sensitive files into public version of ChatGPT

#52

There have to be GovCloud only LLMs just for this case. I swear this government is headed by appointed nephews of appointed nephews. I keep thinking back about that Chernobyl miniseries; head of the science department used to run a shoe factory. No one needs to be competent at their job anymore

[deleted]

Re: CISA’s acting head uploaded sensitive files into public version of ChatGPT

#53
If I did this with a banal internal documentation at work I would be written up and maybe fired over breaking known policy. This administration is so ridiculously incompetent, and interim head of cyber security.. leaks. The onion wouldn't write this.

Re: CISA’s acting head uploaded sensitive files into public version of ChatGPT

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Incompetence and conspiracies go hand-in-hand.

Not really. It is far easier to explain incompetence in powerful positions than to explain competence on purpose in powerful positions - the latter is definitely a conspiracy, the former is not.

This administration’s incompetence allows their opponents to conspire much more effectively.

Re: CISA’s acting head uploaded sensitive files into public version of ChatGPT

#55

This administration's op-sec has been consistently "barney fife" levels of incompetence.

The trick is how to weaponize the incompetence against them.

There at least one country that weaponised it against the US.

Re: CISA’s acting head uploaded sensitive files into public version of ChatGPT

#56

It's bizarre that someone would choose to use the public, 4o bot over the ChatGPT Pro level bot available in the properly siloed and compliant Azure hosted ChatGPT already available to them at that time. The government can use segregated secure systems set up specifically for government use and sensitive documents. It looks like he requested and got permission to work with "For Unofficial Use Only" documents on ChatG…

> It's bizarre that someone would choose to use the public, 4o bot over the ChatGPT Pro level bot available in the properly siloed

You're assuming the planted lackey has any knowledge of these tools.

Re: CISA’s acting head uploaded sensitive files into public version of ChatGPT

#57
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The article says > [ChatGPT] is blocked for other Department of Homeland Security staff. Gottumukkala “was granted permission to use ChatGPT with DHS controls in place,” adding that the use was “short-term and limited.” He had a special exemption to use it as head of Cyber and still got flagged by cybersecurity checks. So obviously they don't think it's safe to use broadly. They already have a deal with OpenAI to bui…

Somehow I think that the weak link in our government security is at the top - the President, his cabinet, and various heads of agencies. Because nobody questions what they're allowed to do, and so they're exempt from various common-sense security protocols. We already saw some pretty egregious security breaches from Pete Hegseth.

That's also the case in businesses. No one denies the CEO a security exemption.

Re: CISA’s acting head uploaded sensitive files into public version of ChatGPT

#58
post #32

It’s absolutely necessary to have ChatGPT.com blocked from ITAR/EAR regulated organizations, such as aerospace, defense, etc. I’m really shocked this wasn’t already the case.

"The report says Gottumukkala requested a special exemption to access ChatGPT, which is blocked for other Department of Homeland Security staff."

That they got this is shocking in itself.

Re: CISA’s acting head uploaded sensitive files into public version of ChatGPT

#59
post #34
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Gottumukkala had requested to see access to a controlled access program—an act that would require taking a polygraph Are the US ok? It's 2026 not 1926

The polygraph is still used for security vetting, today. No word on whether they still read a lamb's entrails for portents or consult the dead with a Ouija board.

> No word on whether they still read a lamb's entrails for portents or consult the dead with a Ouija board.

Don’t give RFK Jr ideas.

Re: CISA’s acting head uploaded sensitive files into public version of ChatGPT

#60
post #45
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Gottumukkala had requested to see access to a controlled access program—an act that would require taking a polygraph Are the US ok? It's 2026 not 1926

It's actually a few minutes to 1929, so that checks out.

Feels like 1935
Post reply on HN