How TechCrunch must change to stay relevant to the startup community
1–10 of 26 posts
Re: How TechCrunch must change to stay relevant to the startup community
#2Re: How TechCrunch must change to stay relevant to the startup community
#3Re: How TechCrunch must change to stay relevant to the startup community
#4I find value and entertainment in its long-form, insightful content (typically written by guest writers like Nir Eyal, Semil Shah, etc.), funding announcements (knowing what's funded matters), and even its link-bait, sensational articles. I don't think TechCrunch is trying or should be THE source for deep analysis or discussion. There are other sources for that (e.g. Quibb, Quora, individual personal blogs like Joel Gasconigne)... and that's OK.
Re: How TechCrunch must change to stay relevant to the startup community
#5Re: How TechCrunch must change to stay relevant to the startup community
#6In that analysis, I found that month-over-month, response rate (in terms of average Likes and Comments on news stories) seem to be stable, and increasing. While an increase in pageviews may be caused by linkbait titles, if people are responding to articles more frequently, we can assume that they're "relevant", in this case.
Re: How TechCrunch must change to stay relevant to the startup community
#7Re: How TechCrunch must change to stay relevant to the startup community
#8Re: How TechCrunch must change to stay relevant to the startup community
#9Why should I care whether they are relevant?