Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Another $100,000 will be in the form of a guaranteed benefit for their families after they pass away. > So half of it will never be seen by the athlete This can't be right, right? I never heard of people "receiving a donation" that you get the promise of now, but will be given to your family once you die, sounds a bit macabre. And as you mention, also pointless, how would that make them "break through new frontiers…
Have you never heard of a trust before? They have all sorts of stipulations depending on what the person creating the trust wants. It's very common for a kid to only get access to their trust when they turn 18 with more access granted at other milestones. It also sounds like a free life insurance policy. Those also only pay out when someone dies. This doesn't sound macabre at all to me. Sounds more like loophole find…
Ross Stevens Donates $100M to Pay Every US Olympian and Paralympian $200k
21–30 of 191 posts
Re: Ross Stevens Donates $100M to Pay Every US Olympian and Paralympian $200k
#22> “I do not believe that financial insecurity should stop our nation’s elite athletes from breaking through to new frontiers of excellence,” Stevens said upon the announcement of his gift. So his goal is to prevent money issues from being a thing getting in the way of athletes achieving. But he has structured it in a way that prevents the money from helping this goal. > Per the Wall Street Journal, “Half will come 20…
It allows them to "income smooth". They will know they're getting $100k down the road, so they can count on having that money to use for their kids' college or part of their nest egg. In the meantime, they can spend more freely. As for the gift to their heirs, that also allows them to consume somewhat more freely, instead of purchasing (as much) life insurance. Most young people don't, but people who compete in dange…
Re: Ross Stevens Donates $100M to Pay Every US Olympian and Paralympian $200k
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
It allows them to "income smooth". They will know they're getting $100k down the road, so they can count on having that money to use for their kids' college or part of their nest egg. In the meantime, they can spend more freely. As for the gift to their heirs, that also allows them to consume somewhat more freely, instead of purchasing (as much) life insurance. Most young people don't, but people who compete in dange…
That's like $75 a year of term life insurance for a young healthy person.
Re: Ross Stevens Donates $100M to Pay Every US Olympian and Paralympian $200k
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you never heard of a trust before? They have all sorts of stipulations depending on what the person creating the trust wants. It's very common for a kid to only get access to their trust when they turn 18 with more access granted at other milestones. It also sounds like a free life insurance policy. Those also only pay out when someone dies. This doesn't sound macabre at all to me. Sounds more like loophole find…
Yes, I've heard of all of those things, but never used in a way to motive the person who is currently alive.
Re: Ross Stevens Donates $100M to Pay Every US Olympian and Paralympian $200k
#25Granted, that's 20 to 60 years down the line...
Oh this explains it:
> Starting with the Olympic and Paralympic Games Milan-Cortina 2026, and going at least through the 2032 Games, every U.S. Olympian and Paralympian will receive $200,000 in financial benefits for each Games in which they compete:
Re: Ross Stevens Donates $100M to Pay Every US Olympian and Paralympian $200k
#26Re: Ross Stevens Donates $100M to Pay Every US Olympian and Paralympian $200k
#27> “I do not believe that financial insecurity should stop our nation’s elite athletes from breaking through to new frontiers of excellence,” Stevens said upon the announcement of his gift. So his goal is to prevent money issues from being a thing getting in the way of athletes achieving. But he has structured it in a way that prevents the money from helping this goal. > Per the Wall Street Journal, “Half will come 20…
> half of it will never be seen by the athlete Guaranteed benefits can be monetized. The gift’s goal is to start building generational wealth. But nothing prevents me from lending one of these athletes $50k today if they give me an LPOA over that death benefit tomorrow (assuming this doesn’t breach any covenants).
It’s a totally different story if those are in a trust which is invested on behalf of the athletes, which pays out the invested value at time of disbursement. But I would be shocked if it were set up that way. Pleasantly shocked but shocked nonetheless.
Re: Ross Stevens Donates $100M to Pay Every US Olympian and Paralympian $200k
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, I've heard of all of those things, but never used in a way to motive the person who is currently alive.
A trust that says you don't get access to the rest unless you graduate college isn't meant as motivation? Allowing extra payout for a house only if married? People have put all sorts of limitations on trusts specifically as motivation.
No, a trust that is setup to give your family money when you die, in order to serve as motivation for you to "break through new frontiers of excellence"
Re: Ross Stevens Donates $100M to Pay Every US Olympian and Paralympian $200k
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Another $100,000 will be in the form of a guaranteed benefit for their families after they pass away. > So half of it will never be seen by the athlete This can't be right, right? I never heard of people "receiving a donation" that you get the promise of now, but will be given to your family once you die, sounds a bit macabre. And as you mention, also pointless, how would that make them "break through new frontiers…
Why even question it? Its a donation that no one ever had to make.
Still not worth questioning?
Re: Ross Stevens Donates $100M to Pay Every US Olympian and Paralympian $200k
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
It allows them to "income smooth". They will know they're getting $100k down the road, so they can count on having that money to use for their kids' college or part of their nest egg. In the meantime, they can spend more freely. As for the gift to their heirs, that also allows them to consume somewhat more freely, instead of purchasing (as much) life insurance. Most young people don't, but people who compete in dange…
Do you think a 21-year old fencer will be more competitive because of this money? A 17-year old swimmer? A 16-year old gymnast?