Jellyfin LLM/"AI" Development Policy
jellyfin.org
Jellyfin LLM/"AI" Development Policy
1–10 of 112 posts
Re: Jellyfin LLM/"AI" Development Policy
#2> LLM output is expressly prohibited for any direct communication
I would like to see this more. As a heavy user of LLMs I still write 100% of my own communication. Do not send me something an LLM wrote, if I wanted to read LLM outputs, I would ask an LLM.
Re: Jellyfin LLM/"AI" Development Policy
#3Seems perfectly legit and hopefully it will help creating new contributors that learn and understand what the AI helped them generate.
Re: Jellyfin LLM/"AI" Development Policy
#4> Violating this rule will result in closure/deletion of the offending item(s).
Should just be an instant perma-ban (along with closure, obviously).
Re: Jellyfin LLM/"AI" Development Policy
#5I think at some point we will need a "PEP-8" for LLM / AI code contributions document that is universally reusable and adoptable per project, call it an "Agent Policy" or what have you, that any agent worth its Salt should read before touching a codebase and warn the user that their contributions might not be accepted or what have you, depending on project policy, just like we have GPL, BSD, MIT, etc it would probably make sense to have it, especially for those of us who are respectful to a projects needs and wishes. I think there's definitely room for sane LLM code / vibe coded code, but you have to put in a little work to validate your changes, run every test, ensure that you understand the output and implications, not just shove a PR at the devs and hope they accept it.
A lot of the time open source PRs are very strategic pieces of code that do not introduce regressions, an LLM does not necessarily know or care, and someone vibe coding might not know the projects expectations. I guess instead of / aside from a Code of Conduct, we need a sort of "Expectation of Code" type of document that covers the projects expectations.
Re: Jellyfin LLM/"AI" Development Policy
#6This seems fair, tbh. And I fully agree on the policy for issues/discussions/PRs.
I know there will probably be a whole host of people from non-English-speaking countries who will complain that they are only using AI to translate because English is not their first (or maybe even second) language. To those I will just say: I would much rather read your non-native English, knowing you put thought and care into what you wrote, rather than reading an AIs (poor) interpretation of what you hoped to convey.
Re: Jellyfin LLM/"AI" Development Policy
#7> LLM output is expressly prohibited for any direct communication I would like to see this more. As a heavy user of LLMs I still write 100% of my own communication. Do not send me something an LLM wrote, if I wanted to read LLM outputs, I would ask an LLM.
Yeah I use LLMs to show me how to shorten my emails because I can type for days. It helps a lot for when I feel like I just need a short concise email but I still write it all myself.
Re: Jellyfin LLM/"AI" Development Policy
#8I suspect the vast number of individuals in developing countries currently spamming LLM commits to every open source project on earth, and often speak neither the project or programming language are not going to pay much attention to this policy. It’s become a numbers game of automation blasting “contributions” at projects with name recognition and hoping you sneak one in for your resume/portfolio.
Re: Jellyfin LLM/"AI" Development Policy
#9> LLM output is expressly prohibited for any direct communication I would like to see this more. As a heavy user of LLMs I still write 100% of my own communication. Do not send me something an LLM wrote, if I wanted to read LLM outputs, I would ask an LLM.
Same can go for LLM code. I don't want to review your code if it was written by an LLM
I only use LLM to write text/communication because that's the part I don't like about my work
Re: Jellyfin LLM/"AI" Development Policy
#10This seems fair, tbh. And I fully agree on the policy for issues/discussions/PRs. I know there will probably be a whole host of people from non-English-speaking countries who will complain that they are only using AI to translate because English is not their first (or maybe even second) language. To those I will just say: I would much rather read your non-native English, knowing you put thought and care into what you…
Although: "An exception will be made for LLM-assisted translations if you are having trouble accurately conveying your intent in English."