How much will that cost taxpayers when a judgment is entered for punitive damages?
DHS: Critical ICE surveillance footage from abuse case was never recorded
11–20 of 22 posts
Re: DHS: Critical ICE surveillance footage from abuse case was never recorded
#12Why was this flagged?
Re: DHS: Critical ICE surveillance footage from abuse case was never recorded
#13Why was this flagged?
There are pro-Trump bots that automatically try to get things removed if they paint the administration in any negative light.
Re: DHS: Critical ICE surveillance footage from abuse case was never recorded
#14Why was this flagged?
The real reason:
> Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, [...]. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.
From the guidelines linked at the bottom of the page.
Re: DHS: Critical ICE surveillance footage from abuse case was never recorded
#15Why was this flagged?
404 is auto flagged.
Re: DHS: Critical ICE surveillance footage from abuse case was never recorded
#16Re: DHS: Critical ICE surveillance footage from abuse case was never recorded
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
404 is auto flagged.
It's not.
Dang's response a while ago when I reported a dead 404media link:
> The site 404media.co is banned on HN because it has been the source of too many low-quality posts and because many (most?) of their articles are behind a signup wall. So that's why that one was killed. I've unkilled it now.
(I'd extremely disagree with the low-quality part)
Re: DHS: Critical ICE surveillance footage from abuse case was never recorded
#18Re: DHS: Critical ICE surveillance footage from abuse case was never recorded
#19How much will that cost taxpayers when a judgment is entered for punitive damages?
Whatever it is, Much less than any Trump and friends grift.
Re: DHS: Critical ICE surveillance footage from abuse case was never recorded
#20Why is this flagged? When did Internet censorship become a non-tech story?