Never ask who is using staging again - Introducing Divergence
layervault.tumblr.com
Never ask who is using staging again - Introducing Divergence
1–10 of 10 posts
Re: Never ask who is using staging again - Introducing Divergence
#2Re: Never ask who is using staging again - Introducing Divergence
#3Wow, I want this at work.
Re: Never ask who is using staging again - Introducing Divergence
#4Re: Never ask who is using staging again - Introducing Divergence
#5Re: Never ask who is using staging again - Introducing Divergence
#6How do you handle migrations? What if there is a migration in the feature-1 branch which breaks other branches?
Re: Never ask who is using staging again - Introducing Divergence
#7Re: Never ask who is using staging again - Introducing Divergence
#8what happens with changes that have impact on the datastore such as adding migrations? Do those get executed when the appropriate branch gets checked out? What happens when two branches create conflicting changes in the datastore?
Re: Never ask who is using staging again - Introducing Divergence
#9aaa.staging1.example.com api.staging2.example.com
Re: Never ask who is using staging again - Introducing Divergence
#10what happens with changes that have impact on the datastore such as adding migrations? Do those get executed when the appropriate branch gets checked out? What happens when two branches create conflicting changes in the datastore?
At LayerVault, each migration always happens on its own branch separate from the feature. We've been operating like that since day 1, and it hasn't been an issue yet.