Live data from Hacker News

FAA institutes nationwide drone no-fly zones around ICE operations

aerotime.aero

211–220 of 245 posts

Re: FAA institutes nationwide drone no-fly zones around ICE operations

#211
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the real danger of religion. When you train people from birth to turn off their brains and submit to authority without question, this is what happens.

Not quite. Religion, when taught properly, can serve as an innoculant against corrupt states, as it ingrains a kernel of understanding that man, and all his works are flawed, falling short of the perfection only attainable by the divine. There is always something higher worth maintaining loyalty toward. Like most things though, practicing that doesn't make you super popular with "leaders of worship" who wield their p…

Not in the real world.

Religions are inherently centralized, and sociopaths are always drawn to centralized power.

Re: FAA institutes nationwide drone no-fly zones around ICE operations

#212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know if it ever was labeled a genocide, but Sri Lanka has a long history of Buddhist lead attacks against Tamils and other minorities. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_and_violence

Fair enough. Seems like the common thread is religion + government = atrocities

Centralized power + sentient beings who occasionally produce sociopaths = atrocities.

This is why no one person should have so much unilateral power.

Re: FAA institutes nationwide drone no-fly zones around ICE operations

#213
post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mark my word, if and when these preachers get control of the [Republican] party, and they're sure trying to do so, it's going to be a terrible damn problem. Frankly, these people frighten me. Politics and governing demand compromise. But these Christians believe they are acting in the name of God, so they can't and won't compromise. I know, I've tried to deal with them. Barry Goldwater He had a few more pertinent quo…

Correction: you cannot have a debate with people who have set up their politics as a God. In the scriptures God is depicted as someone who sometimes is willing to have a debate, and reason with people, of course not to learn anything, but to explain why things are (or must be) the way they are. In some instances, God is even depicted as willing to listen to man and do things he otherwise would not have done, so long…

God hates being anthropomorphized.

Re: FAA institutes nationwide drone no-fly zones around ICE operations

#214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A civil war is coming whether you like it or not. The mentally-ill are running the asylum and executing citizens. No matter what crazy shit the gop/tea party/maga have accused the left of NONE of it came to pass until they themselves were in power. The administration WANTS a civil war; they’re ensuring one happens. If you’re against owning guns, you’re in for a world of hurt. So buckle-up butter cup, shit is gonna be…

> The mentally-ill are running the asylum and executing citizens. The the natural outcome should be rebellion. Why would it be civil war? Do you presume that the "other half" completely agree with Trump and would literally fight you to the death over it? You bandy about these terms as if you do not understand their true meaning. > The administration WANTS a civil war So you're going to play exactly into that? Why on…

Arguably, there is a major contingency that will support Trump no matter what. We know this already. They are not shy about it.

So yes, there certainly would be some level of civil war.

It would be wishful thinking it would only be the people rising up against the government. If we had any level of that type unification then we wouldn’t be in the mess we’re in now.

Re: FAA institutes nationwide drone no-fly zones around ICE operations

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But they also said the president can’t be punished for doing illegal things, so what difference does it make?

That’s not what they ruled.

It is what they ruled. What do you gain from lying about this?

Re: FAA institutes nationwide drone no-fly zones around ICE operations

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ok he can tell his chain of command some lies then. Same difference.

How on earth is that going to make the orders lawful?

Do you think immunity is for lawful things? Why on earth are you arguing that unlawful acts are not covered by immunity? What exactly do you think immunity makes someone immune from?

Re: FAA institutes nationwide drone no-fly zones around ICE operations

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ordering violence orchestrated by the military is a core constitutional power. It's called being "commander-in-chief" of the armed forces. The ruling makes it very clear that core constitutional powers have conclusive and preclusive (absolute) immunity. Other official acts have presumptive immunity. In all cases, the motive is above question. If Trump has a fight with Melania, he can order the CIA to rendition and di…

> Ordering violence orchestrated by the military is a core constitutional power. It's called being "commander-in-chief" of the armed forces. Incorrect. The commander in chief, same as all military officers, has the authority to issue lawful orders to the chain of command below him. He does not have the authority to issue unlawful orders, and if he does, his subordinates have the legal obligation to disobey them. The…

Have you actually read the SC opinion or are you just assuming what it says? It is apparently the latter.

>No he can't because this is against the law

What exactly do you think immunity makes someone immune from?

Re: FAA institutes nationwide drone no-fly zones around ICE operations

#218

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How so? The ruling was that he had full immunity during "presidential duties", which has many times been interpreted by the SC as "anything he wants to do while president."

> The ruling was that he had full immunity during "presidential duties" Yes. This was basically agreed upon before that the president has legal immunity for exercising his constitutional powers, but was never explicitly ruled on by the court. If the president does something outside his legal authority, then that isn't his presidential duty, and he can be punished. > which has many times been interpreted by the SC as…

You have clearly not actually read the opinion being discussed and have resorted to outright lying about what it says. Please stop it.

Re: FAA institutes nationwide drone no-fly zones around ICE operations

#219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm flying very experimental drones (~1 Kg only so not super heavy, but still, you don't want one to land on your head) in an urban environment so I really care a lot about keeping things safe and within my yard. This seems like it was the easiest way to get really hard safety guarantees. That thing is going nowhere further than the length of the tether. Building drones is fun, there is a ton to learn and the constra…

Thank you so much for sharing this excellent resource. I'm watching this youtube video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlD0C5CrWcA ) and he apparently built this out to support his Master's research at the University of Maryland, where I went to school for undergrad. The long arm of the DMV no-fly zone is no joke!

In one of his videos he claims he's 'not a software guy' and then proceeds to put together a piece of control software that is more flexible and far better laid out than whatever is out there in common usage.

He's right in many ways, unfortunately I really need all those other features as well, but I think there is something to be said for ripping the inner control loops (rate, level, stabilization) out of say Arducopter and replacing it with this stuff on a separate micro controller. It's much easier to divorce stability and primary flight characteristics from things like high level mission planning and such and it isn't rare at all for such things to get in each others way in the usual suspects (Betaflight, INAV, Arducopter and various derivatives of these three).

Re: FAA institutes nationwide drone no-fly zones around ICE operations

#220
post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, that’s been the GOP playbook for 20+ years. It’s only recently been used for US citizens.

[flagged]

I will do what it takes to defend my country and the countries of others that are attacked, from within or without. And take into account that I'm really a pacifist at heart, absolutely abhor war and do not believe in the kind of idiocy that war stands for. Even so, there are limits to what I'll let happen before I will reluctantly become an active participant.

You are all over this thread spouting your crap, I highly doubt that anything at all will change your mind. But you sound scared of protests, and you seem to believe that the attackers are the defenders and the other way around. One day the attackers will come for you, and by then there will be nobody left to defend you.

Post reply on HN