Live data from Hacker News

Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

iranintl.com

41–50 of 844 posts

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#41
post #24

[flagged]

The fact that he said that and then DID NOT topple the government in Iran is insane.. completely irresponsible, or rather responsible.. for those deaths.

The irony is that now those who are still alive in Iran might remember this and update their notion of US trustworthiness accordingly.

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#44
post #2

I can't comprehend how a population can kill that many of their own people. They aren't even an "other" people, which has been the most common scapegoat lately. Same skin color, same religion, same language, same homeland.

[flagged]

[flagged]

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Are these really left and right issues? IE as the right is becoming more anti-Israel, you find a lot more pro Islamic Republic stuff there these days. The boomer and zoomer right are very different beasts. I don't follow the left as closely these days, but imagine there are a myriad of opinions on the matter.

Roger Waters is a boomer but reflects the zoomer left well. (To be clear I will be forever grateful to him for his music but he should really stop talking when it comes to the Iranian and Ukrainian people)

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#47
post #2

I can't comprehend how a population can kill that many of their own people. They aren't even an "other" people, which has been the most common scapegoat lately. Same skin color, same religion, same language, same homeland.

[flagged]

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#48
post #2

I can't comprehend how a population can kill that many of their own people. They aren't even an "other" people, which has been the most common scapegoat lately. Same skin color, same religion, same language, same homeland.

I can easily comprehend it, the history books are full of people killing large numbers of their own people. They just find some irrelevant differentiating factor that allows them to label the other as the outgroup and bring out the guns, the tanks, the ovens and the bombs.

Also, they know the alternative is that they will be dragged in the streets and killed. Iran is long past the point where a revolution can be peaceful and conciliatory; if the regime falls, there will be a redde rationem where most people connected to enforcement and decision-making will be very summarily judged by the people they abused for decades.

Re: Over 36,500 killed in Iran's deadliest massacre, documents reveal

#49

The source (Iran International) is backed by Saudi money and has a bias to dunk on Iran. That said, I'm sure the death count numbers from the Rasht Massacre are staggeringly higher than the initial tallies of 2-5k.

It looks a LOT like a CIA front.

EDIT: Sorry... that is too strong... "state aligned influence media". Note that the headline might be true, or it might not, but that source is quite glowy.

Post reply on HN