Earlier quoted context omitted.
Two points here. First, automation is a new orthogonal dimension. You can have automation with or without plain text. Second, your emphasis on "automation" leads me to believe that perhaps you misunderstand what accounting is. Accounting is not just taking a list of transactions and recording them (database, file etc). That is called bookkeeping . Yes, accounting is also amenable to automation, but much less so than…
> This understanding in turn isn't stored anywhere other than the accountant's mental model of the entity he's doing the accounting for. It doesn’t have to be this way, though. It isn’t impossible (for most use cases) to embed that mental model into your automation tools. You the correct that it means you can’t have purely general purpose automation that will do all accounting work for every entity, but you could cer…
The fact that accountants still exist should tell you that you're mistaken.