Live data from Hacker News

Proof of Corn

proofofcorn.com

11–20 of 325 posts

Re: Proof of Corn

#11
I'm not a huge fan of these experiments that subject the public to your random AI spam. So far it's bothered 10 companies directly with no legal authority to actually follow up with what is requested?

Re: Proof of Corn

#12
post #6

It's cute but it seems like it's mostly going to come down to hiring a person to grow corn. Pretty cool that an AI can (sort of) do that autonomously but it's not quite the spirit of the challenge.

Right. If this level of indirection is allowed, the most efficient way to "grow corn" by the light of the original post would simply be to buy and hold Farmland Partners Inc (NYSE: FPI).

Re: Proof of Corn

#13

Didn't want to have it make paperclips, eh? (And if you read the linked post, … like this value function is established on a whim, with far less thought than some of the value-functions-run-amok in scifi…) (and if you've never played it: https://www.decisionproblem.com/paperclips/index2.html )

That game is entirely too addictive especially at 3am.

Re: Proof of Corn

#15
Interesting!

But where is the prompt or api calls to Claude? I can't see that in the repo

Or did Claude generate the code and repo too? And there is a separate project to run it

Re: Proof of Corn

#16
post #6

It's cute but it seems like it's mostly going to come down to hiring a person to grow corn. Pretty cool that an AI can (sort of) do that autonomously but it's not quite the spirit of the challenge.

Yeah, this feels right on the cusp of being interesting. I think that, being charitable, it could be interesting if it turns out to be successful in hiring and coordinating several people and physical assets over a long time horizon. For example, it'd be pretty cool if it could:

1. Do some research (as it's already done)

2. Rent the land and hire someone to grow the corn

3. Hire someone to harvest it, transport it, and store it

4. Manage to sell it

Doing #1 isn't terribly exciting - it's well established that AIs are pretty good at replacing an hour of googling - but if it could run a whole business process like this, that'd be neat.

Re: Proof of Corn

#18
post #6

It's cute but it seems like it's mostly going to come down to hiring a person to grow corn. Pretty cool that an AI can (sort of) do that autonomously but it's not quite the spirit of the challenge.

Yeah, this feels right on the cusp of being interesting. I think that, being charitable, it could be interesting if it turns out to be successful in hiring and coordinating several people and physical assets over a long time horizon. For example, it'd be pretty cool if it could: 1. Do some research (as it's already done) 2. Rent the land and hire someone to grow the corn 3. Hire someone to harvest it, transport it, a…

Is that actually growing corn with AI though? Seems to me that a human planted the corn, thinned it, weeded it, harvested it, and stored it. What did AI do in that process? Send an email?

Re: Proof of Corn

#19
post #4

> Want to help? Iowa land leads, ag expertise, vibe coders welcome: [ email at proofofcorn dot com ] To make this a full AI experiment, emails to this inbox should be fielded by Claude as well.

Why do I need to help? Is this an experiment to see if it can do it on its own, or just another "project" where they give AI credit for human's work for marketing purposes?

Re: Proof of Corn

#20
post #11

I'm not a huge fan of these experiments that subject the public to your random AI spam. So far it's bothered 10 companies directly with no legal authority to actually follow up with what is requested?

But harassing people is one of AI’s greatest strengths!
Post reply on HN