GPTZero finds 100 new hallucinations in NeurIPS 2025 accepted papers
1–10 of 528 posts
Re: GPTZero finds 100 new hallucinations in NeurIPS 2025 accepted papers
#2Yuck, this is going to really harm scientific research.
There is already a problem with papers falsifying data/samples/etc, LLMs being able to put out plausible papers is just going to make it worse.
On the bright side, maybe this will get the scientific community and science journalists to finally take reproducibility more seriously. I'd love to see future reporting that instead of saying "Research finds amazing chemical x which does y" you see "Researcher reproduces amazing results for chemical x which does y. First discovered by z".
Re: GPTZero finds 100 new hallucinations in NeurIPS 2025 accepted papers
#3It would be great if those scientists who use AI without disclosing it get fucked for life.
Re: GPTZero finds 100 new hallucinations in NeurIPS 2025 accepted papers
#4If these are so easy to identify, why not just incorporate some kind of screening into the early stages of peer review?
Re: GPTZero finds 100 new hallucinations in NeurIPS 2025 accepted papers
#5Yuck, this is going to really harm scientific research. There is already a problem with papers falsifying data/samples/etc, LLMs being able to put out plausible papers is just going to make it worse. On the bright side, maybe this will get the scientific community and science journalists to finally take reproducibility more seriously. I'd love to see future reporting that instead of saying "Research finds amazing che…
Have they solved the issue where papers that cite research already invalidated are still being cited?
Re: GPTZero finds 100 new hallucinations in NeurIPS 2025 accepted papers
#6Wow! They're literally submitting references to papers by Firstname Lastname, John Doe and Jane Smith and nobody is noticing or punishing them.
Re: GPTZero finds 100 new hallucinations in NeurIPS 2025 accepted papers
#7It would be great if those scientists who use AI without disclosing it get fucked for life.
"scientists" FYI. Making shit up isn't science.
Re: GPTZero finds 100 new hallucinations in NeurIPS 2025 accepted papers
#8It would be great if those scientists who use AI without disclosing it get fucked for life.
One fuck seems appropriate.
Re: GPTZero finds 100 new hallucinations in NeurIPS 2025 accepted papers
#9Which is worse:
a) p-hacking and suppressing null results
b) hallucinations
c) falsifying data
Would be cool to see an analysis of this
Re: GPTZero finds 100 new hallucinations in NeurIPS 2025 accepted papers
#10It would be great if those scientists who use AI without disclosing it get fucked for life.
Harsh sentiment. Pretty soon every knowledge worker will use AI every day. Should people disclose spellcheckers powered by AI? Disclosing is not useful. Being careful in how you use it and checking work is what matters.