Live data from Hacker News

Spotify won court order against Anna's Archive, taking down .org domain

arstechnica.com

21–30 of 166 posts

Re: Spotify won court order against Anna's Archive, taking down .org domain

#21
post #15

Deezer has in its onboarding flow a pretty cool "get your lists from spotify" feature. from all liked/currated songs - a few thousands - it could not match about 2.

could you expand on this please? if I understood correctly then Deezer fails to match songs from a list of thousands? thanks

Re: Spotify won court order against Anna's Archive, taking down .org domain

#22
I don't understand the sealing and ex-parte motions in this case. It looks completely corrupt. They're claiming that the archive would have released all the material publicly if they were allowed to know an injunction was about to be filed against them.

Yet all those songs certainly have illegal copies already being distributed on the internet. So what was the actual harm being prevented here? I cannot understand how they hoodwinked a court into this misguided procedure.

Re: Spotify won court order against Anna's Archive, taking down .org domain

#24
post #16

Technical question: I run my own Pi hole dns server. Is it possible to just add an A record for it? What are you guys doing to get around this?

Wikipedia has a list of active domains: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna%27s_Archive

Re: Spotify won court order against Anna's Archive, taking down .org domain

#26

what‘s in it for spotify? i can‘t think of a single person who‘d stop paying for streaming services (music) in favour of going back to illegally download or (or even legally purchase) songs & managing their own library. m a y b e some devs would. but those thinking about it, wouldn‘t be stopped like that. i am thinking about it, yet i just renewed my subscription because i lack time & motivation to crawl down yet ano…

Many people are cancelling Spotify among my friends, even very "non-technical" folks. For me I've just gone back to radio or Youtube:ing a few songs for free here and there. Paying the cost of a lunch every month is just not worth it anymore for subscription services.

I know people who recently canceled, but I think it has more to do with them raising the price.

Re: Spotify won court order against Anna's Archive, taking down .org domain

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Since they don't "own" the data they lost, only "rent" it, they probably have to be seen doing something about it, lest they face the wrath of record companies.

I have a really hard time imagining the record companies giving a shit about this, this isn't a pre-release leak. All the valuable content is already freely and easily available for download on the internet.

It's performance art all the way down - it repeatedly states they are not happy about piracy and will come after anyone doing it.

This isn't aimed at pirates as much as it's aimed at non-pirates, especially companies with significant assets.

They know full well pirates don't care, but it's a message to any company or entity seen as "too friendly" with pirates or that enables pirates to do their thing.

Re: Spotify won court order against Anna's Archive, taking down .org domain

#28
post #7

But you can't even download the allegedly infringing material from the .org site. You can just read about it? So they're abusing the All Writs Act to take down a site that they think is related to some undetermined future nebulously bad thing for their business. If I wasn't on Anna's side before, I sure am now.

unless you have a billion dollars, not sure anyone cares what side you're on.

Voting with your wallet no longer really matters does it unless your wallet is attached to a billion dollar stock portfolio.

Re: Spotify won court order against Anna's Archive, taking down .org domain

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Many people are cancelling Spotify among my friends, even very "non-technical" folks. For me I've just gone back to radio or Youtube:ing a few songs for free here and there. Paying the cost of a lunch every month is just not worth it anymore for subscription services.

This is also a big party of why artists don’t earn shit. Spotify will never be able to pay out enough if people don’t think this music is worth paying for. They want access to every new album but refuse to pay how much a single new CD would have cost back in the day

> This is also a big party of why artists don’t earn shit.

The pie that Spotify divides up among the artists is a global one. It's not like you listen to one artist, so they get your 10 bucks every month. You're paying Taylor Swift, even though you never listen to her.

Re: Spotify won court order against Anna's Archive, taking down .org domain

#30

what‘s in it for spotify? i can‘t think of a single person who‘d stop paying for streaming services (music) in favour of going back to illegally download or (or even legally purchase) songs & managing their own library. m a y b e some devs would. but those thinking about it, wouldn‘t be stopped like that. i am thinking about it, yet i just renewed my subscription because i lack time & motivation to crawl down yet ano…

I'm old enough to have an mp3 collection, so I haven't needed spotify. They don't have 20% of the tracks in my playlist and their integration of local audio has been steadily eroded to be almost unusable now (i.e. it's completely separate, doesn't show up in regular search, playlists etc.). They also push audiobooks and sponsored results in my face even on the Premium subscription, and their UI sucks.

If you already have a collection and are reasonably content in what you listen to, topping it up with a few albums a year is not that hard.

Or just use youtube music!

Post reply on HN