Live data from Hacker News

The super-slow conversion of the U.S. to metric (2025)

thefabricator.com

11–20 of 422 posts

Re: The super-slow conversion of the U.S. to metric (2025)

#11
post #6
post #2

The metric systems's worse flaw was doubling down on base 10 instead of the plainly superior base 12.

Being able to count using fingers is more valuable than having one more prime factor.

You can actually count to 12 on your fingers using one hand. Use the thumb as a pointer, then for each of your other fingers you have three joints. So 3*4=12.

Re: The super-slow conversion of the U.S. to metric (2025)

#12
post #5
post #2

The metric systems's worse flaw was doubling down on base 10 instead of the plainly superior base 12.

Only in certain fields. For most interactions divide by 10 is far easier than divide by 12, and you'd end up with far, far more "eyeballed" measurements. So no, as a human being, I'm fine with base 10.

Or you'd have to go all in and write numbers in base 12 too, then dividing by 12 would be easier...

Re: The super-slow conversion of the U.S. to metric (2025)

#15
post #2

The metric systems's worse flaw was doubling down on base 10 instead of the plainly superior base 12.

This can make sense for currency, but units of weight and distance and so on are infinitely divisible. You can just have a third of a metre if you like. Or 333 mm if the inaccuracy is acceptable. And so on.

Re: The super-slow conversion of the U.S. to metric (2025)

#16
post #11
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Being able to count using fingers is more valuable than having one more prime factor.

You can actually count to 12 on your fingers using one hand. Use the thumb as a pointer, then for each of your other fingers you have three joints. So 3*4=12.

Or use a hand as a 5-bit integer, then you can count to 31 :)

Re: The super-slow conversion of the U.S. to metric (2025)

#17
post #11
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Being able to count using fingers is more valuable than having one more prime factor.

You can actually count to 12 on your fingers using one hand. Use the thumb as a pointer, then for each of your other fingers you have three joints. So 3*4=12.

If you include the tip, you can do base 16.

Let’s go hexadecimal all the way.

Re: The super-slow conversion of the U.S. to metric (2025)

#18
post #8
post #4

> U.S. customary (the more accurate name for what’s sometimes the called the British Imperial system) For those wondering why there is this distinction, the British Imperial units were created by the Weights and Measures Act 1824; US customary units follow the Winchester Standard of 1588.

And in a few places they're different (US measuring "cup" vs UK, US gallon, etc) edit: ref https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/zfnjb7h

UK doesn't use cups in recipes and fuel is dispensed in litres.

Road signs are still in miles.

Re: The super-slow conversion of the U.S. to metric (2025)

#20
post #11
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Being able to count using fingers is more valuable than having one more prime factor.

You can actually count to 12 on your fingers using one hand. Use the thumb as a pointer, then for each of your other fingers you have three joints. So 3*4=12.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN