Live data from Hacker News

Level S4 solar radiation event

swpc.noaa.gov

121–130 of 205 posts

Re: Level S4 solar radiation event

#121
post #9

We had intense aurora in Berlin, Germany. Green clouds dancing in the sky levels. Started around 22:10 local time or a bit earlier, and at this point there's only a faint red/green glow remaining.

Can confirm, I've seen pink/green glow over Berlin Sky (and pictures as well)

Re: Level S4 solar radiation event

#122
post #9

We had intense aurora in Berlin, Germany. Green clouds dancing in the sky levels. Started around 22:10 local time or a bit earlier, and at this point there's only a faint red/green glow remaining.

Just spend an hour outsite (Northern Germany, 01:00 MET). Unfortunately nothing to report, neither visual nor on camera. Maybe I just went to late and missed the show. I hope you habe more luck in Canada and the US!

I'm Berlin was around 22-23 o'clock visible

Re: Level S4 solar radiation event

#123
post #9

We had intense aurora in Berlin, Germany. Green clouds dancing in the sky levels. Started around 22:10 local time or a bit earlier, and at this point there's only a faint red/green glow remaining.

Oh really? Oh no I missed it! Is it going to happen again today?

Re: Level S4 solar radiation event

#124
post #11

If anyone is interested in what "G4" means in context, here's the scale: https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation

G4: " Induced pipeline currents affect preventive measures, HF radio propagation sporadic..." G5: " Pipeline currents can reach hundreds of amps, HF (high frequency) radio propagation may be impossible in many areas for one to two days..."

Sam Altman has entered an agreement to acquire all future G4 and G5 energy

Re: Level S4 solar radiation event

#125

Any tips on best practices in how one can protect homelab rigs from a Carrington level event? Let's say we were given two days notice that the mother of all S4s was inbound. Just switch everything off? What if one of my homelabs needed 100% uptime to meet my wife's SLA for messaging? Is this able to be protected?

Make sure you have a surge protector or ups, in case it makes the power grid go funky. Which you should have anyway. Also, it could be a convenient excuse to upgrade to fiber internet service if you haven't already. (Yes, excuse. Equipment should have more than good enough isolation to not care.)

Even if you don't have fiber all the way into your house, most cable internet terminates pretty close to the home these days. It kind of has to, since bandwidth has gone way up and as a result they can't put very many subscribers on the same termination system.

We didn't really understand this kind of thing when the Carrington event happened, so nobody knows for sure, but estimates for induced voltage on long conductors are usually something on the order of 20V/km. So for a 5 km long coaxial cable, you're only talking about ~120V of induced potential difference (i.e. the same voltage as a residential plug in the US). When people are analyzing the potential damage from this kind of electromagnetic disturbance (E3 is the term you'll see, based on analysis of nuclear EMP which has other components that you don't see in geomagnetic storms regardless of severity), it's mostly about really long conductors, like on the order of 100km.

Re: Level S4 solar radiation event

#127
post #11

If anyone is interested in what "G4" means in context, here's the scale: https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation

G4: " Induced pipeline currents affect preventive measures, HF radio propagation sporadic..." G5: " Pipeline currents can reach hundreds of amps, HF (high frequency) radio propagation may be impossible in many areas for one to two days..."

Waiting until it's like a G6, Like a G6

Now I'm feelin' so fly like a G6

Re: Level S4 solar radiation event

#128

Hopefully it's clear space weather for Artemis II coming up. I wonder what they do if it's inclement en route ?

There's not that much they can do. It's often discussed that if the extreme August 1972 solar storm had overlapped with an Apollo mission (it didn't), it would have acutely sickened the astronauts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/August_1972_solar_storms#Human... > "Had a mission been taking place during August, those inside the Apollo command module would have been shielded from 90% of the incoming radiation. However,…

For All Mankind “illustrated” a solar storm at surface-level of the moon, including “boiling” regolith. I wonder how embellished this was, or whether particle bombardment would actually cause this.

My mind goes to the working mechanism of eidophor projectors, where oil on the projection bowl does indeed deform under electron beam exposure.

Re: Level S4 solar radiation event

#129
post #11

If anyone is interested in what "G4" means in context, here's the scale: https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation

Interestingly, there are about 100 events of this severity (G4) per cycle, and a single cycle lasts 11 years. This means there are about nine G4 events on average per year.

Note, however, that the solar cycle [0] is so named due to its minimum and maximum: the most severe events will be clustered around the maximum, rather than spread out over the whole cycle (as your comment suggested) - so the "nine G4 events on average per year" is mathematically true but not so helpful.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle

Re: Level S4 solar radiation event

#130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Queue Chernobyl documentary clip measuring the radiation as low because that’s as high the meter went

s/queue/cue/ Though I suppose you could also queue it.

Meant the first and people should do the second, Chernobyl on HBO is great.

It’s also technically not a documentary but historical drama.

Post reply on HN