Wow CNN's website is awful. They only let me accept tracking cookies, then threw 'subscribers only' at me. I'm not sure I'll ever click a CNN link again.
javascript:window.open('https://archive.ph/newest/'+location.href.split('?')%5B0%5D,'_blank')11–20 of 57 posts
Wow CNN's website is awful. They only let me accept tracking cookies, then threw 'subscribers only' at me. I'm not sure I'll ever click a CNN link again.
javascript:window.open('https://archive.ph/newest/'+location.href.split('?')%5B0%5D,'_blank')"It’s hard to quantify just how widespread the phenomenon is, but certain notably offline hobbies are exploding in popularity." Assuming this is an actual trend that is actually "exploding"... I wonder what this means for the short term in the AI industry? Could we see a drop in users and then a big popping of the bubble? That does seem like a really big assumption though.
The article almost encourages this interpretation, although I'd praise it for at least acknowledging the "performance" part.
It seems to mash consumerism, commercial Social Media and GenAI into one though.
Still, I try to see the positive side, and I think there certainly could be such a trend.
No idea if it's just a small part of people going against the grain, or a broader shift.
Regarding media addiction, there is a pattern that would be kind of similar, the large cohort of elderly people who are addicted to media and the commercial web, compared to the comparatively smaller portion of younger people falling victim.
Among my "elder millenial" friends, I can only say that abstinence from doomscrolling and modern tech (especially smartphones and SM) seems to correlate with integrity and smartness.
"It’s hard to quantify just how widespread the phenomenon is, but certain notably offline hobbies are exploding in popularity." Assuming this is an actual trend that is actually "exploding"... I wonder what this means for the short term in the AI industry? Could we see a drop in users and then a big popping of the bubble? That does seem like a really big assumption though.
The number of knitting kits sold (an example from the article) to me sounds like it might correlate more with the number of TikTok videos about knitting than the hours spent knitting. The article almost encourages this interpretation, although I'd praise it for at least acknowledging the "performance" part. It seems to mash consumerism, commercial Social Media and GenAI into one though. Still, I try to see the positi…
Also, "knitting kits" were not a thing for most of my life. You'd just buy yarn needles and yarn. This is not some kind of a craft where you need dozens of implements.
The kit is pretty much a product of the TikTok / YT influencer era. Indeed, a typical kit will often contain needles, yarn, and a... link to a video you can watch:
https://www.amazon.com/Complete-Knitting-Kit-Beginners-Acces...
I still think the internet could undergo a "collapse" and rapidly shrink to something resembling the 2000's internet. The enshitification of everything is quite literally, "mining out" the value of the internet, hollowing everything from below. At some point, nothing is believable and putting your "content" online amounts to giving it away. Eventually, the users _will_ walk away and suddenly the whole affair falls ap…
Anecdotally, I have friends who have recently bought turntables out of the blue and gotten into vinyl. Other friends who never had any interest in my analog cameras are asking about film. My wife has even switched from scrolling Instagram at night to working on a crossword book with a pencil.
None of them have put it exactly this way, but in divisive times, I think social media is just exhausting. And now you can't even really tell what's real.
"It’s hard to quantify just how widespread the phenomenon is, but certain notably offline hobbies are exploding in popularity." Assuming this is an actual trend that is actually "exploding"... I wonder what this means for the short term in the AI industry? Could we see a drop in users and then a big popping of the bubble? That does seem like a really big assumption though.
If the AI industry takes a hit because people are returning to offline hobbies, it’s a signal we’ve been building the wrong things.
This seems ubiquitous (in baby steps) in my social circles. I think there's a big difference between general ai (LLMs) and the troubling implementations of ai like flock, and other surveillance implementations, spotify and their distortion of music, and their investment into ai military drone tech, etc. and how wrapped up politics has become in everything. Its a bad time to have a browser in your pocket.
I don’t know how ubiquitous it is in my circles, but I have noticed a lot of folks in their 20s and 30s tell me they only buy paper books, never Kindle. I started buying only the latter years ago because of the convenience and lack of a need for storage, but have recently switched to getting everything I can (digitally) through the library and the Libby app.
I think AI is just a tipping point and an easy target.
I still think the internet could undergo a "collapse" and rapidly shrink to something resembling the 2000's internet. The enshitification of everything is quite literally, "mining out" the value of the internet, hollowing everything from below. At some point, nothing is believable and putting your "content" online amounts to giving it away. Eventually, the users _will_ walk away and suddenly the whole affair falls ap…
Why have I been seeing people use "enshitification" so much lately? Yes I know where it comes from and what it means. It's like Cory Doctorow is the new Noam Chomsky of IT and enshitification has replaced "manufactured consent".
Wow CNN's website is awful. They only let me accept tracking cookies, then threw 'subscribers only' at me. I'm not sure I'll ever click a CNN link again.
This JavaScript (make a bookmarklet) should open the latest archive.ph snapshot of any page you're on: javascript:window.open('https://archive.ph/newest/'+location.href.split('?')%5B0%5D,'_blank')