Install.md: A standard for LLM-executable installation
1–10 of 124 posts
Re: Install.md: A standard for LLM-executable installation
#2[stub for offtopicness] Since the article has been changed to tone down its provocative opener, which clearly had a kicking-the-anthill effect, I'm moving those original reactions to this subthread.
> Installing software is a task which should be left to AI.
Just like installing spice racks is a task which which should be left to military engineer corps.
Re: Install.md: A standard for LLM-executable installation
#3[stub for offtopicness] Since the article has been changed to tone down its provocative opener, which clearly had a kicking-the-anthill effect, I'm moving those original reactions to this subthread.
This has to be a joke right?
> Installing software is a task which should be left to AI.
Absolutely I don't think so. This is a very bad idea.
$ curl | bash was bad enough. But $ curl -fsSL | claude looks even worse.
What could possibly go wrong?
Re: Install.md: A standard for LLM-executable installation
#4[stub for offtopicness] Since the article has been changed to tone down its provocative opener, which clearly had a kicking-the-anthill effect, I'm moving those original reactions to this subthread.
This has to be a joke right? > Installing software is a task which should be left to AI. Absolutely I don't think so. This is a very bad idea. $ curl | bash was bad enough. But $ curl -fsSL | claude looks even worse. What could possibly go wrong?
fascinating. i personally (biased bc i work at Mintlify) think a markdown file makes more sense than a bash script because at least Claude kind of has your best interests at heart.
Re: Install.md: A standard for LLM-executable installation
#5[stub for offtopicness] Since the article has been changed to tone down its provocative opener, which clearly had a kicking-the-anthill effect, I'm moving those original reactions to this subthread.
>Installing software is a task which should be left to AI.
This is such an insane statement. Is this satire?
Re: Install.md: A standard for LLM-executable installation
#6[stub for offtopicness] Since the article has been changed to tone down its provocative opener, which clearly had a kicking-the-anthill effect, I'm moving those original reactions to this subthread.
>Installing software is a task which should be left to AI
What?? How do I get off of this train? I used to come to hacker news for a reason...what the fuck am I reading
Re: Install.md: A standard for LLM-executable installation
#7[stub for offtopicness] Since the article has been changed to tone down its provocative opener, which clearly had a kicking-the-anthill effect, I'm moving those original reactions to this subthread.
I don’t understand how this made it to the front page
Re: Install.md: A standard for LLM-executable installation
#8[stub for offtopicness] Since the article has been changed to tone down its provocative opener, which clearly had a kicking-the-anthill effect, I'm moving those original reactions to this subthread.
should've been posted on April 1st. would be better suited on that specific date! /s
Re: Install.md: A standard for LLM-executable installation
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
This has to be a joke right? > Installing software is a task which should be left to AI. Absolutely I don't think so. This is a very bad idea. $ curl | bash was bad enough. But $ curl -fsSL | claude looks even worse. What could possibly go wrong?
fascinating. i personally (biased bc i work at Mintlify) think a markdown file makes more sense than a bash script because at least Claude kind of has your best interests at heart.
> Claude kind of has your best interests at heart
How we've all been blue-pilled. Sigh..
Re: Install.md: A standard for LLM-executable installation
#10What is the benefit of having this be a standard? Can't an agent follow a guide just as easily in document with similar content in a different structure?