What he did with messaging... So he will centralize all of it with known broken SGX metadata protections, weak supply chain integrity, and a mandate everyone supply their phone numbers and agree to Apple or Google terms of service to use it?
Do you know a better alternative that I can get my elderly parents and non-technical friends to use? I haven’t come across one and from my amateur POV it seems much better than WhatsApp or Telegram.
Confer – End to end encrypted AI chat
151–160 of 180 posts
Re: Confer – End to end encrypted AI chat
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's totally comments of people using Telegram.
It's just people having zero product sense, or an idea of what it means to target more than 0.01% of the market. The last comment said that Signal's problem is that it's mobile-first, which, how does someone even think that a messaging app should be anything other than mobile-first?
Re: Confer – End to end encrypted AI chat
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's FHE, but that's probably an even more difficult technical challenge than doing everything locally
FHE is impossible. You cannot expect to compete on 100x more cost for the same service you provide (and there is no design for accelerated hardware (Tensor Core) on FHE).
Re: Confer – End to end encrypted AI chat
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's just people having zero product sense, or an idea of what it means to target more than 0.01% of the market. The last comment said that Signal's problem is that it's mobile-first, which, how does someone even think that a messaging app should be anything other than mobile-first?
Having Google and Apple apps is fine. Having that be the only option, and the recommended option for high risk use cases is unforgivable.
Re: Confer – End to end encrypted AI chat
#155Re: Confer – End to end encrypted AI chat
#156Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm sure some people who don't realise it's a pseudonym do? Sounds like you're one of them.
Lol, why are you so mad? My while point is that he doesn’t reveal his actual name.
Re: Confer – End to end encrypted AI chat
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
Having Google and Apple apps is fine. Having that be the only option, and the recommended option for high risk use cases is unforgivable.
Those aren't the only two options. You can buy a non-Google Android phone and install the APK on it.
Re: Confer – End to end encrypted AI chat
#158Re: Confer – End to end encrypted AI chat
#159What he did with messaging... So he will centralize all of it with known broken SGX metadata protections, weak supply chain integrity, and a mandate everyone supply their phone numbers and agree to Apple or Google terms of service to use it?
Do you know a better alternative that I can get my elderly parents and non-technical friends to use? I haven’t come across one and from my amateur POV it seems much better than WhatsApp or Telegram.
Re: Confer – End to end encrypted AI chat
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lol, why are you so mad? My while point is that he doesn’t reveal his actual name.
Oh man, I didn't think I'll actually see a reply with "u mad bro?" on this site. Anyway, good luck with your endeavors.