Live data from Hacker News

GOV.UK: new government site built with open source software, £70 million cheaper

digital.cabinetoffice.gov.uk

31–40 of 47 posts

Re: GOV.UK: new government site built with open source software, £70 million cheaper

#31
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is pretty important point IMO. Why couldn't they use a local analytics system? Perhaps partner with one of the OS analytics like Piwik? Edit: Um, I just looked, they don't appear to be using GA but a local system already?

Err... Still there when I look at the page source for the front page at https://www.gov.uk

@andyjohnson0 - it's in there, around line 29 in the source.

    _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-26179049-1']);
We're also referring to http://gov.uk, which is what the OP link refers to, not the OP link itself.

Re: GOV.UK: new government site built with open source software, £70 million cheaper

#32
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is it important to use a local system? What is wrong with using the best system for the job wherever in the world it comes from?

Because it's important that recorded information about my interactions with my government doesn't cross borders and escape from the data protection laws in the UK and the EU. If it was a traditional software system that actually ran on the servers owned by the government then that would be fine. With GA, at the very least Google get to know when I visit the site, and likely which pages I visit, simply through the req…

Is there not a separate deal for Governments and Educational Institutes with Google to negate this?

Re: GOV.UK: new government site built with open source software, £70 million cheaper

#33
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Err... Still there when I look at the page source for the front page at https://www.gov.uk

@andyjohnson0 - it's in there, around line 29 in the source. _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-26179049-1']); We're also referring to http://gov.uk , which is what the OP link refers to, not the OP link itself.

Thanks! You're right and I'm wrong. I've edited my comment to make this clear.

Re: GOV.UK: new government site built with open source software, £70 million cheaper

#35
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Demand is greater than supply in London, which is a big issue. It turns people towards high salary bidding wars, which to be honest offsets the saving.

I haven't noticed a huge shortage of Ruby on Rails devs in London, and the average salaries don't reflect a major shortage either. According to itjobswatch.co.uk, the average Ruby salary is the same as the average Java salary in London. I also thought the idea of hiring cheap, sub-par developers as a way of saving costs was somewhat discredited by now.

Thats advertised rates. The actual rates are higher or you lose people before you get a chance to offer a place to them.

We employ starting at £50,000 and we still lose 80% of our candidates to better cash sums.

Re: GOV.UK: new government site built with open source software, £70 million cheaper

#36
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Demand is greater than supply in London, which is a big issue. It turns people towards high salary bidding wars, which to be honest offsets the saving.

When I interviewed with the GOV.UK people in January it turned out that the seemingly good salary they were offering was actually about the same as I'm currently paid up here in Leeds. However, the pension element of the compensation was relatively generous.

Yes that doesn't surprise me.

If you've lived in London for a number of years, you'll realise you need real cash up front to survive here as the transport and accomodation costs are sky high.

My rent for the 3 bed terraced house in South West London I moved into on Saturday could get me a 7 bedroom mansion with several acres of ground near Leeds...

Re: GOV.UK: new government site built with open source software, £70 million cheaper

#37
post #32
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it's important that recorded information about my interactions with my government doesn't cross borders and escape from the data protection laws in the UK and the EU. If it was a traditional software system that actually ran on the servers owned by the government then that would be fine. With GA, at the very least Google get to know when I visit the site, and likely which pages I visit, simply through the req…

Is there not a separate deal for Governments and Educational Institutes with Google to negate this?

I honestly have no idea, and the page on cookies does seem to say that they don't allow google to use the data or do much with it, but that just raises further questions as to how they could ever enforce that.

I guess I'm just very suspicious when personal data crosses borders.

EDIT - also wondering what you mean by a separate deal? If the data goes to the US it goes to the US and is then subject to US laws (and no longer subject to EU/UK protections, deal or no.

Re: GOV.UK: new government site built with open source software, £70 million cheaper

#39
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I haven't noticed a huge shortage of Ruby on Rails devs in London, and the average salaries don't reflect a major shortage either. According to itjobswatch.co.uk, the average Ruby salary is the same as the average Java salary in London. I also thought the idea of hiring cheap, sub-par developers as a way of saving costs was somewhat discredited by now.

Thats advertised rates. The actual rates are higher or you lose people before you get a chance to offer a place to them. We employ starting at £50,000 and we still lose 80% of our candidates to better cash sums.

Hello, I'd like to get in touch with you. Would you be OK with sharing your email address please?

Cheers.

Re: GOV.UK: new government site built with open source software, £70 million cheaper

#40
post #16
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To be fair, Drupal et al. are great for throwing at non-technical users and letting them create their own content.

Absolutely agree. But for an entity like the UK govt having plentiful resources, it would be sheer laziness to go with a solution like Drupal due to ease in initial setup. Besides, most Drupal sites look sort of kludgy in appearance.

You do realize the "appearance" of a site has nothing to do with the underlying stack, right? A Django site can appear like a Rails site can appear like a Drupal site can appear like a ...

You can argue for differences in behaviour, sure; but appearance?

Post reply on HN