ICE takes back into custody man released for violation of rights
1–10 of 77 posts
Re: ICE takes back into custody man released for violation of rights
#2‘“We were there for a check-in and the original officer said, ‘This looks good, I’ll be right back,’” Prokosch said. “And then there was a lot of chaos, and about five officers came out and then they said, ‘We’re going to be taking him back into custody.’ I was like, ‘Really, you want to do this again?’”’
Re: ICE takes back into custody man released for violation of rights
#3‘“We were there for a check-in and the original officer said, ‘This looks good, I’ll be right back,’” Prokosch said. “And then there was a lot of chaos, and about five officers came out and then they said, ‘We’re going to be taking him back into custody.’ I was like, ‘Really, you want to do this again?’”’
So the judge ruled the original detention unconstitutional, and then they asked him to “check in” as a deceptive ruse to detain him again? The idea being this time it is constitutional?
Re: ICE takes back into custody man released for violation of rights
#4‘“We were there for a check-in and the original officer said, ‘This looks good, I’ll be right back,’” Prokosch said. “And then there was a lot of chaos, and about five officers came out and then they said, ‘We’re going to be taking him back into custody.’ I was like, ‘Really, you want to do this again?’”’
So the judge ruled the original detention unconstitutional, and then they asked him to “check in” as a deceptive ruse to detain him again? The idea being this time it is constitutional?
Correct.
Re: ICE takes back into custody man released for violation of rights
#5In my view, no immunity attaches to a "law enforcement" officer's knowing violation of the letter or the spirit of court orders.
Re: ICE takes back into custody man released for violation of rights
#6‘“We were there for a check-in and the original officer said, ‘This looks good, I’ll be right back,’” Prokosch said. “And then there was a lot of chaos, and about five officers came out and then they said, ‘We’re going to be taking him back into custody.’ I was like, ‘Really, you want to do this again?’”’
So the judge ruled the original detention unconstitutional, and then they asked him to “check in” as a deceptive ruse to detain him again? The idea being this time it is constitutional?
[dead]
Re: ICE takes back into custody man released for violation of rights
#7In my view, no immunity attaches to a "law enforcement" officer's knowing violation of the letter or the spirit of court orders.
Fully agreed. This is a violation of the spirit of the law and will make everyone view law enforcement agents as untrustworthy protectors of our Constitution.
Re: ICE takes back into custody man released for violation of rights
#8They're going to continue abusing people, injuring them, killing them and violating their rights because there's no accountability. The administration endorses this behavior.
Dissolve ICE, dissolve DHS, impeach Noem and prosecute and or bar every single ERO agent from future public service.
Re: ICE takes back into custody man released for violation of rights
#9its hard to see how the United States recovers from this administration
Re: ICE takes back into custody man released for violation of rights
#10In my view, no immunity attaches to a "law enforcement" officer's knowing violation of the letter or the spirit of court orders.
But who holds them accountable? The DOJ right? Is that who can pursue a case against government officials violating constitutional rights? If so, it’s not enough. We need a rethink of checks and balances. This was clear even after the first Trump administration but we’re well past that now, and in this first year the second Trump administration has conducted a lot more violations.