Live data from Hacker News

List of individual trees

en.wikipedia.org

31–40 of 117 posts

Re: List of individual trees

#31
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s Wikipedia. Make the change you want to see in the page.

With respect, that is naive. To demonstrate, create a new account and go ahead and make that change. It will be reverted. Wikipedia is not the democratic free-for-all it once was. If you do perform that experiment and I am wrong, please come back and let us know.

Wikipedia is and has always been a wiki; reverting bad or controversial edits has always been expected from day one.

Also Wikipedia has developed an editorial line of its own, so it's normal that edits that go against the line will be put in question; if that happens to you, you're expected to collaborate in the talk pages to express your intent for the changes, and possibly get recommendations on how to tweak it so that it sticks.

It also happens that most of contributions by first timers are indistinguishable from vandalism or spam; those are so obvious that an automated bot is able to recognize them and revert them without human supervision, with a very high success rate.

However if those first contributions are genuinely useful to the encyclopedia, such as adding high quality references for an unverified claim, correcting typos, or removing obvious vandalism that slipped through the cracks, it's much more likely that the edits will stay; go ahead and try that experiment and tell us how it went.

Re: List of individual trees

#33

Several more https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Individual_physical_o... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lists_of_individual_a...

The list of animals has dolphins and birds but not humans?

Consistent with this definition of ”animal” - https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/animal#English:_any_nonhuman_...

Re: List of individual trees

#34
Why is Pippi Longstocking's "soda pop tree" not on the list? It's dying and the whole of Sweden are freaking out. We're putting tax payer money on solving its disease. We're developing a vaccine to try and save it for gods sake. Yes, this is a very LOL type of situation to the rest of the world, I know that. But it's not a laughing matter in Sweden: https://www.slu.se/nyheter/2025/11/pippis-sockerdrickstrad-r...

Re: List of individual trees

#36

Several more https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Individual_physical_o... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lists_of_individual_a...

My dumb butt thought it was gonna be a list of every tree in the world, all eight gazillion of them

This is a map of all trees in the Netherlands

https://boomregister.nl/overzichtskaart-van-de-bomen-in-nede...

Re: List of individual trees

#37

Several more https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Individual_physical_o... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lists_of_individual_a...

My dumb butt thought it was gonna be a list of every tree in the world, all eight gazillion of them

I did a search, there are an estimated 3 trillion trees in the world; somehow that's much fewer than I expected.

Re: List of individual trees

#38
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My dumb butt thought it was gonna be a list of every tree in the world, all eight gazillion of them

This is a map of all trees in the Netherlands https://boomregister.nl/overzichtskaart-van-de-bomen-in-nede...

I loathe these stupid widgets that show a blank map as soon as you zoom out a little (past the 1000m scale in this case). How can you fail so hard at your only job?

Re: List of individual trees

#39
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s Wikipedia. Make the change you want to see in the page.

With respect, that is naive. To demonstrate, create a new account and go ahead and make that change. It will be reverted. Wikipedia is not the democratic free-for-all it once was. If you do perform that experiment and I am wrong, please come back and let us know.

I’ve made several edits to wiki-pages without even having an account. A few got reverted, most stayed.

Some pages/topics are more open to changes than others, that much is true.

Post reply on HN