Part of a 2nd half of this book translated to Go became a skeleton for the BCL configuration language https://github.com/wkhere/bcl
Crafting Interpreters
11–20 of 62 posts
Re: Crafting Interpreters
#12Crafting Interpreters is the one thing that LLM's can do really really well. Because it is so easy to define and test.
Here are is a new LUA interpreter implemented in Python:
https://github.com/rhulha/MoonPie
And here is a new language:
Re: Crafting Interpreters
#13I stopped reading when he started using the visitor pattern
Re: Crafting Interpreters
#14I stopped reading when he started using the visitor pattern
The bytecode interpreter in the second half of the book doesn't use the visitor pattern.
Re: Crafting Interpreters
#15Crafting Interpreters is the one thing that LLM's can do really really well. Because it is so easy to define and test. Here are is a new LUA interpreter implemented in Python: https://github.com/rhulha/MoonPie And here is a new language: https://github.com/rhulha/EasyScript
> Because it is so easy to define and test
Probably also because there 100+ implementations for it to copy from
Re: Crafting Interpreters
#16Crafting Interpreters is the one thing that LLM's can do really really well. Because it is so easy to define and test. Here are is a new LUA interpreter implemented in Python: https://github.com/rhulha/MoonPie And here is a new language: https://github.com/rhulha/EasyScript
What even is the point of that? The whole point of the book is to get a sense and mindset of crafting compilers.
Re: Crafting Interpreters
#17Re: Crafting Interpreters
#18Re: Crafting Interpreters
#19I stopped reading when he started using the visitor pattern
What’s bad about the visitor pattern? /gen
Re: Crafting Interpreters
#20I stopped reading when he started using the visitor pattern
[deleted]