Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB
21–30 of 395 posts
Re: Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB
#22They could make it 1000GB for US$10/month and I still wouldn't give any money to a company associated with that man.
Like it or not, Persians love him.
Re: Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB
#23They could make it 1000GB for US$10/month and I still wouldn't give any money to a company associated with that man.
Re: Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB
#24They could make it 1000GB for US$10/month and I still wouldn't give any money to a company associated with that man.
Re: Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB
#25They could make it 1000GB for US$10/month and I still wouldn't give any money to a company associated with that man.
Re: Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB
#26They could make it 1000GB for US$10/month and I still wouldn't give any money to a company associated with that man.
"That man" is the only person so far who's actually helped the Iranian people get their voices heard amidst government shutdown of the entire internet. Like it or not, Persians love him.
Re: Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB
#27Nice that instead of completely cutting you off at the cap they put it in super slow 500 kbits. That is actually usable and used to be the fastest speed you could get at home.
Re: Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Be aware that it is bits, so 62.5kb. But I agree, the internet is still usable with that.
> Be aware that it is bits, so 62.5kb Ok, I’m not normally one to be the pedantic bits/bytes guy, but if you’re gonna go and make a bit/byte “clarification” you need to get the annotation correct or you'll just confuse everyone. It’s 500kb (small b for bits) and 62.5kB(capital/big B for bytes).
Re: Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB
#29They could make it 1000GB for US$10/month and I still wouldn't give any money to a company associated with that man.
Re: Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB
#30There’s lots to say about how useable it is (I often get throttled when traveling and it’s really not that bad + it helps curb any desire to scroll videos!)
But mainly I want to ask - I looked into it for a minute and it seems like you couldn’t start an mvno because carriers wouldn’t let you cannibalize them?
You can get very cheap IoT plans but if you tried reselling IoT as esims for consumers, the carriers would kill it?
So yeah - Starlink to mobile is actually the only viable way that routes around this problem?
(((email in profile if you’re cuckoo enough like me and want to start a self service’d throttled mvno)))
[0] https://bsky.app/profile/greg.technology/post/3mbmwsytnyc23