Live data from Hacker News

Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB

starlink.com

1–10 of 395 posts

Re: Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB

#4
post #2

Nice that instead of completely cutting you off at the cap they put it in super slow 500 kbits. That is actually usable and used to be the fastest speed you could get at home.

My first company was an ISP, and our selling point was that we had higher bandwith out of Norway than any competitors in our price range.... A whopping 512kps.

Re: Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB

#5
post #2

Nice that instead of completely cutting you off at the cap they put it in super slow 500 kbits. That is actually usable and used to be the fastest speed you could get at home.

Still with pretty low latency (25-35ms) as well (similar to the Standby (aka pause) state you can put the account into for $5/mo)

Re: Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB

#7
post #2

Nice that instead of completely cutting you off at the cap they put it in super slow 500 kbits. That is actually usable and used to be the fastest speed you could get at home.

That's faster than my cell phone in the areas where I desperately need Starlink....500kb > 0

Re: Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB

#8
post #2

Nice that instead of completely cutting you off at the cap they put it in super slow 500 kbits. That is actually usable and used to be the fastest speed you could get at home.

That's faster than my cell phone in the areas where I desperately need Starlink....500kb > 0

Be aware that it is bits, so 62.5kb. But I agree, the internet is still usable with that.

Re: Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB

#9
I’ve kept it on the backup service for 10 GB at $10 or whatever and it’s pretty cool. Used it off my balcony in SF when Google Fiber had a 1 hr outage, take it on road trips, and stuff like that. Totally worth it.

Re: Roam 50GB is now Roam 100GB

#10
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's faster than my cell phone in the areas where I desperately need Starlink....500kb > 0

Be aware that it is bits, so 62.5kb. But I agree, the internet is still usable with that.

People always use bits for connectivity. 62.5kB/sec -- maybe really 55-60kB/sec downloaded. Or 18 seconds to get a megabyte.

This is simultaneously fast (on my 14400 bps modem that I spent the most time "waiting for downloading", I was used to 12-13 minutes per megabyte vs. 18 seconds here) and slow (the google homepage is >1MB, so until you have resources cached you're waiting tens of seconds).

It would be nice if everything were just a touch more efficient.

Post reply on HN