11–20 of 159 posts
Am I the only one who saw this syntax and immediately though "Man, this looks almost identical to Rust with a few slight variations"?
It seems to just be Rust for people who are allergic to using Rust. It looks like a fun project, but I'm not sure what this adds to the point where people would actually use it over C or just going to Rust.
I guess the point is what is subtracts, instead - answer being the borrow-checker.
Initial commit was 24h ago, 363 stars, 20 forks already. Man, this goes fast.
In fact why not simply write rust to begin with?
I am not too familiar with C - is the idea that it's easier to incrementally have some parts of your codebase in this language, with other parts being in regular C?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It seems to just be Rust for people who are allergic to using Rust. It looks like a fun project, but I'm not sure what this adds to the point where people would actually use it over C or just going to Rust.
> what this adds I guess the point is what is subtracts, instead - answer being the borrow-checker.
Why not compile to rust or assembly? C seems like an odd choice. In fact why not simply write rust to begin with?
Why not compile to rust or assembly? C seems like an odd choice. In fact why not simply write rust to begin with?
Why not compile to rust or assembly? C seems like an odd choice. In fact why not simply write rust to begin with?