https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/about-us/information-...
I'm surprised to see this granularity (# of applicants/admitted/enrolled to a college broken out by high school).
31–40 of 199 posts
https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/about-us/information-...
I'm surprised to see this granularity (# of applicants/admitted/enrolled to a college broken out by high school).
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s always been this way; previously we just had to play to the old white men’s biases.
Yeah, there’s really no way around it when you have more qualified students than slots, unless you just mark each applicant as qualified or not and run a lottery. But they do have to “craft a class” to some extent. An obvious example is athletic recruiting, but some schools are consciously thinking about populating other extracurriculars, like marching bands or orchestras. And you also don’t want a class that’s all c…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They should just make this explicit, like the UT system does. The top X% of students are admitted automatically from each school.
This seems terrible incentives. You are now in a purely adversarial relationship with your peers and hurting them helps you
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They should just make this explicit, like the UT system does. The top X% of students are admitted automatically from each school.
This seems terrible incentives. You are now in a purely adversarial relationship with your peers and hurting them helps you
Just because the top X% is guaranteed admission, that does not mean all (or even most) of the school is from the top X%.
See: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-04-12/covid-co... Excerpts: UC admissions directors stressed that they evaluated students in the context of their own schools and communities to assess how much they challenged themselves and took advantage of available opportunities. A student who took all six AP classes offered at her school might be more impressive than the one who took six at a school that offere…
Honestly, I don't know how do you even compare students with different backgrounds against each other. That's why standardized testing is good - it gives everyone the same chance to excel.
How does the existence of standardized testing give everyone the same chance? As an extremely over-exaggerated example example, someone whose home study time is disrupted frequently by gunfire outside is probably not getting the same chance as someone who lives on a 20 acre estate with private tutors for every subject.
See: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-04-12/covid-co... Excerpts: UC admissions directors stressed that they evaluated students in the context of their own schools and communities to assess how much they challenged themselves and took advantage of available opportunities. A student who took all six AP classes offered at her school might be more impressive than the one who took six at a school that offere…
Damn, this is as stupid as it gets.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They should just make this explicit, like the UT system does. The top X% of students are admitted automatically from each school.
This seems terrible incentives. You are now in a purely adversarial relationship with your peers and hurting them helps you
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Right, up until middle school send kids to the best school, then for high school move to an area with poor schools.
Maybe they can bring their resources with them too, and the poor schools can have things like lead paint remediation, honors classes, and extra curricular activities. I like this idea!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They should just make this explicit, like the UT system does. The top X% of students are admitted automatically from each school.
This seems terrible incentives. You are now in a purely adversarial relationship with your peers and hurting them helps you
The bad thing about UT's policy is that it encourages well-off students to move to a less-competitive school district (usually rural) in order to improve their chances.