Kernel bugs hide for 2 years on average. Some hide for 20
1–10 of 186 posts
Re: Kernel bugs hide for 2 years on average. Some hide for 20
#2Re: Kernel bugs hide for 2 years on average. Some hide for 20
#3One bug is all it takes to compromise the entire system.
The monolithic UNIX kernel was a good design in the 60s; Today, we should know better[0][1].
Re: Kernel bugs hide for 2 years on average. Some hide for 20
#4Re: Kernel bugs hide for 2 years on average. Some hide for 20
#5Millions of lines of code, all running in supervisor mode. One bug is all it takes to compromise the entire system. The monolithic UNIX kernel was a good design in the 60s; Today, we should know better[0][1]. 0. https://sel4.systems/ 1. https://genode.org/
Re: Kernel bugs hide for 2 years on average. Some hide for 20
#6Imagine if no one outside a select circle ever got to examine the code.
We call AI models "open source" if you can download the binary and not the source. Why not programs?
Re: Kernel bugs hide for 2 years on average. Some hide for 20
#7Millions of lines of code, all running in supervisor mode. One bug is all it takes to compromise the entire system. The monolithic UNIX kernel was a good design in the 60s; Today, we should know better[0][1]. 0. https://sel4.systems/ 1. https://genode.org/
Yeah cause windows is amazing Or maybe macos? Ignore their freebsd parts of course.
So is Mach, by the way, if you can afford the microkernel performance overhead.
Re: Kernel bugs hide for 2 years on average. Some hide for 20
#8Impressive results on the model, I'm surprised they improved it with very simple heuristics. Hopefully this tool will be made available to the kernel developers and integrated to the workflow.
Re: Kernel bugs hide for 2 years on average. Some hide for 20
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah cause windows is amazing Or maybe macos? Ignore their freebsd parts of course.
Yes. As far as kernels go, NT was pretty damn good. So is Mach, by the way, if you can afford the microkernel performance overhead.