Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Strange.website

strange.website

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 72 posts

Re: Strange.website

#21

Post by GaryBluto »

boca_honey wrote: post #20
GaryBluto wrote: post #7

I was just thinking to myself about how much the internet was lacking in self-important esoteric gibberish. I am unsurprised to see it came from the same person as "A Website to Destroy All Websites". I am especially befuddled by all the comments stating "This is how the web used to be!"; no it wasn't, and I can only imagine those who think so collate their view of web history purely through what others say on Mastod…

Exactly. Have you noticed that most of these 'weird web' sites don't actually talk about anything besides the web itself? Every other 'indie web' site I stumble upon is just about the indie web.... or worse, just a list of links pointing to other similar sites. There’s no real value here. No new info, no original content. Just clunky web design and rants about 'social media bad.' That’s not how the web actually was.…

You've captured my thoughts better than I could. It feels very much like these projects are cargo cults. The strange (and always off-feeling) attempts to recreate badly-written Geocities websites (out of all the aspects of the 2000s internet to recreate, why such a narrow and dull target?) that are posted here feel very much like how the Melanesians built fake airstrips and conducted pseudo-military drills to attract "cargo", which is in this case is a confused and distorted concept of the "old web".

Re: Strange.website

#22

Post by boca_honey »

vintagedave wrote: post #19
GaryBluto wrote: post #7

I was just thinking to myself about how much the internet was lacking in self-important esoteric gibberish. I am unsurprised to see it came from the same person as "A Website to Destroy All Websites". I am especially befuddled by all the comments stating "This is how the web used to be!"; no it wasn't, and I can only imagine those who think so collate their view of web history purely through what others say on Mastod…

I feel this is a slightly cruel comment. It’s a website of creativity, very well executed. Also, if you read the text, it is right. Some of the presentation (such as the inverted / mirrored square) is pure art. In an admirable sense: art. While I get the commentary — that bit reminded me of House of Leaves which has been criticized for the same thing — there’s a real human behind this, who obviously cares deeply abou…

>someone doing something with passion.

I'd agree if the site covered some history, shared recipes, or even just ranted about the author's favorite movies. But this guy is just trash-talking the entire internet.

"the website has changed. it twists facts to fiction, reality to rubbish, gold into dirt." ... and so on.

If you're going to be cruel, you might get some cruel feedback.

Re: Strange.website

#23

Post by hunter2_ »

dmbche wrote: post #18
urban_alien wrote: post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Care to elaborate on where you're drawing the line between The Internet and The Web? Your comment doesn't make it clear.

At a glance : the internet is the scaffolding/structure, the Web is what people are doing in it. The structure allows for great things. People suck. Hell is other people and all that.

I would qualify it ever so slightly:

The internet is the scaffolding/structure, the Web is what people are doing in a browser (i.e., over HTTP) in it.

Then there's also the stuff people do on the internet without a browser/HTTP. Nobody opens an IMAP/SSH/BitTorrent/IRC client or whatever and thinks of that as surfing the Web, because those aren't browsers nor are they primarily speaking HTTP.

Re: Strange.website

#24

Post by bo1024 »

urban_alien wrote: post #15
adventured wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Internet is fantastic. The Web sucks. On the Internet: any movie I want to watch; any song I want to listen to; an endless parade of games to play via Steam et al.; about a zillion games I can play online with friends; numerous app store options, and an entire other world of smartphone games I can play alone or with friends; inexpensive LLMs I can do almost anything I want to with, wherever my imagination takes m…

Care to elaborate on where you're drawing the line between The Internet and The Web? Your comment doesn't make it clear.

The Internet is a computer network used to transmit information (as packets).

One system built on the Internet is the World Wide Web, which is just webpages served with the http/https protocol.

Other protocols that route over the Internet include email, ssh, Tor, torrents, apps, etc.

Re: Strange.website

#25

Post by peterldowns »

boca_honey wrote: post #20
GaryBluto wrote: post #7

I was just thinking to myself about how much the internet was lacking in self-important esoteric gibberish. I am unsurprised to see it came from the same person as "A Website to Destroy All Websites". I am especially befuddled by all the comments stating "This is how the web used to be!"; no it wasn't, and I can only imagine those who think so collate their view of web history purely through what others say on Mastod…

Exactly. Have you noticed that most of these 'weird web' sites don't actually talk about anything besides the web itself? Every other 'indie web' site I stumble upon is just about the indie web.... or worse, just a list of links pointing to other similar sites. There’s no real value here. No new info, no original content. Just clunky web design and rants about 'social media bad.' That’s not how the web actually was.…

Haven't updated it in a while but here's my attempt at bringing something to the table, you might find it interesting. https://freezine.xyz/

Re: Strange.website

#26

Post by derangedHorse »

vintagedave wrote: post #19
GaryBluto wrote: post #7

I was just thinking to myself about how much the internet was lacking in self-important esoteric gibberish. I am unsurprised to see it came from the same person as "A Website to Destroy All Websites". I am especially befuddled by all the comments stating "This is how the web used to be!"; no it wasn't, and I can only imagine those who think so collate their view of web history purely through what others say on Mastod…

I feel this is a slightly cruel comment. It’s a website of creativity, very well executed. Also, if you read the text, it is right. Some of the presentation (such as the inverted / mirrored square) is pure art. In an admirable sense: art. While I get the commentary — that bit reminded me of House of Leaves which has been criticized for the same thing — there’s a real human behind this, who obviously cares deeply abou…

> Sometimes I wonder, in the ease of critique, what it’s like for the anonymous person on the other end

Here's a better look at how the "anonymous person on the other end" sees things [1]:

> “i’m always polite to chat gpt so it remembers me later ” you are going to die from water-poison-related typhoid in the Great American Megadesert after a particularly nasty heat surge evaporates the rest of the drinkable rations. you will be buried in the sand.

[1] https://bsky.app/profile/strange.website/post/3m33mnmcyys2t

Re: Strange.website

#27

Post by con »

I just made a pretty strange one myself: https://currentcondition.tv

I've added quite a few Easter eggs and a few old school games. Let me know what you think?

Blue dots are locations of previous visitors.. it all works well on desktop, the games need a bit more love to work well on mobile.

Re: Strange.website

#30

Post by masswerk »

Curious detail: the button/widget icons of the browser chrome are composed of multi-layered box-shadows (i.e. one box-shadow definition per pixel or line, concatenated to a sting) of a `:before` pseudo element. (I don't think that I've seen anything alike before.)

Meaning: also no images.

Post reply on HN