Live data from Hacker News

A website to destroy all websites

henry.codes

11–20 of 420 posts

Re: A website to destroy all websites

#11
I used the early web. I miss forums, I miss the small webmaster, I miss making fun, small websites to share with friends.

And while you could make the argument that these forms of media were superior to TikTok, I’d also argue that this is mostly just taste.

While we have closed ecosystems now, they’re much easier to make and share content to than the web of the past. It’s much easier to get distribution and go viral. There’s also a well trodden path to monetization so that if you craft great content people love, you can make a living from it.

Yeah quirky designs, guestbooks, affiliate badges, page counters, all that stuff. I miss it. But only ever a very small fraction of society was going to be able to make and consume that stuff.

This new internet is much more accessible and it occasionally produces diamonds of culture, you just have to know where to look.

So no, I don’t think any amount of decentralized protocols or tooling or any technology really can change this. I think this trend is set and will continue, and I’ve had to learn to be more open minded to how I perceive internet content.

No one is going to make personal websites or change their behavior in a major way.

Look, you can still sign up for free web hosting and make an HTML page and tell your friends. There are still people that do this. But it’s naturally eclipsed by these other methods of much easier content sharing.

The point is the content itself, not the packaging. Just get over the shape of the packaging and enjoy.

Re: A website to destroy all websites

#12

> it wasn’t always like this. I agree. I remember when you could read pages without requiring JavaScript enabled, and when enabled it was enabled it wouldn't cause things to constantly float about as you scroll. One of the biggest reasons you'll never get the "old web" back, is because the culture of the "independent" world wide web morphed into something entirely different from what it was (or more aptly was outrigh…

[deleted]

Re: A website to destroy all websites

#13

I used the early web. I miss forums, I miss the small webmaster, I miss making fun, small websites to share with friends. And while you could make the argument that these forms of media were superior to TikTok, I’d also argue that this is mostly just taste. While we have closed ecosystems now, they’re much easier to make and share content to than the web of the past. It’s much easier to get distribution and go viral.…

> I miss making fun, small websites to share with friends.

You can still do that right now. I highly recommend it.

Re: A website to destroy all websites

#14
The open web needs to be preserved. And bespoke web pages are great. However it isn’t 1998 anymore. The second you expose anything to the public internet it is going to be flooded by malicious bots looking for things to exploit. Unless you are putting up static HTML the learning curve to have a website that runs will continue to run immediately slopes to the point where it is not worth it. Despite OP saying they aren’t invoking nostalgia, they are.

Re: A website to destroy all websites

#15

Not sure if its by design/intent, the font is too small to skim through it

Pretty successful in terms of the content representing the intent. Which is in part, don't skim, don't scroll, read something if you want to actually read something, or go elsewhere for doom-scrolling and skimming.

I also found half-skimming it worked pretty well, using the images as markers to find what I really wanted.

Also it looks like it works pretty good on mobile, I thought it was small on my laptop too, but hey, thanks the heavens for built-in-browser zoom...

Re: A website to destroy all websites

#16
post #2

And it fails to render anything with Javascript disabled.

I disagree with a notion that a page needs to work without javascript. It is only design choice of author.

> I disagree with a notion that a page needs to work without javascript. It is only design choice of author.

Sure, I guess, but if a site that's primarily text doesn't work without Javascript then that's a design failure. I sometimes use a browser like links2 because eliminating everything but text can sometimes help me focus. If the site displays nothing, I'm probably not going to bother reloading it in a different browser just so I can render the text.

(It's a nonissue for this site, which appears to render fine in links2.)

Re: A website to destroy all websites

#17

The open web needs to be preserved. And bespoke web pages are great. However it isn’t 1998 anymore. The second you expose anything to the public internet it is going to be flooded by malicious bots looking for things to exploit. Unless you are putting up static HTML the learning curve to have a website that runs will continue to run immediately slopes to the point where it is not worth it. Despite OP saying they aren…

I mean didnt Geocities solve this and many other problems?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeoCities

Re: A website to destroy all websites

#18
Lovely design - but also shows the inherent problem. Not everyone can create a design like this. Medium and Substack mean that not everyone needs to. When everyone is able to publish, you invariably end up with a lot more crap, and it has to hosted by someone else.

Re: A website to destroy all websites

#19

Lovely design - but also shows the inherent problem. Not everyone can create a design like this. Medium and Substack mean that not everyone needs to. When everyone is able to publish, you invariably end up with a lot more crap, and it has to hosted by someone else.

Text is way too small for me… can’t read it without reader mode being on
Post reply on HN