51–60 of 241 posts
Is anyone else just completely overwhelmed with the number of things you _need_ for claude code? Agents, sub agents, skills, claud.md, agents.md, rules, hooks, etc. We use Cursor where I work and I find it a good medium for still being in control and knowing what is happening with all of the changes being reviewed in an IDE. Claude feels more like a black box, and one with so many options that it's just overwhelming,…
My approach is literally just a top-level, local, git version controlled memory system with 3 commands:
- /handoff - End of session, capture into an inbox.md
- /sync - Route inbox.md to custom organised markdown files
- /engineering (or /projects, /tasks, /research) - Load context into next session
I didn't want a database or an MCP server or embeddings or auto-indexing when I can build something frictionless that works with git and markdown.
Repo: https://github.com/ossa-ma/double (just published it publicly but its about the idea imo)
Is anyone else just completely overwhelmed with the number of things you _need_ for claude code? Agents, sub agents, skills, claud.md, agents.md, rules, hooks, etc. We use Cursor where I work and I find it a good medium for still being in control and knowing what is happening with all of the changes being reviewed in an IDE. Claude feels more like a black box, and one with so many options that it's just overwhelming,…
you really don't need any of this crap. you just need Claude Code and CLAUDE.MD in directories where you need to direct it. complicated AI set ups are mid curve
Things that need special settings now won’t in the future and vice versa.
It’s not worth investing a bunch of time into learning features and prompting tricks that will be obsoleted soon
Is anyone else just completely overwhelmed with the number of things you _need_ for claude code? Agents, sub agents, skills, claud.md, agents.md, rules, hooks, etc. We use Cursor where I work and I find it a good medium for still being in control and knowing what is happening with all of the changes being reviewed in an IDE. Claude feels more like a black box, and one with so many options that it's just overwhelming,…
All I use is curse words and it does a damn great job most of the time
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You say "My Claude Code Setup" but where is the actual setup there? I generally agree with everything about how LLMs should be called you say, but I don't see any concrete steps of changing Claude Code's settings in there? Where are the "35 agents. 68 skills. 234MB of context."? Is the implementation of the "Layer 4" programs intended to be left to the reader? That's hardly approachable.
I got similar feedback with my first blog post on my do router - https://vexjoy.com/posts/the-do-router/ Here is what I don't get. it's trivial to do this. Mine is of course customized to me and what I do. The idea is to communicate the ideas, so you can use them in your own setup. It's trivial to put for example, my do router blog post in claude code and generate one customized for you. So what does it matter to see…
When you've tried 10 ways of doing it but they all end up getting into a "feed the error back into the LLM and see what it suggests next" you aren't that motivated to put that much effort into trying out an 11th.
The current state of things is extremely useful for a lot of things already.
Claude itself can just update the claude.md file with whatever you might have forgot to put in there.
You can stick it in git and it lives with the project.
Is anyone else just completely overwhelmed with the number of things you _need_ for claude code? Agents, sub agents, skills, claud.md, agents.md, rules, hooks, etc. We use Cursor where I work and I find it a good medium for still being in control and knowing what is happening with all of the changes being reviewed in an IDE. Claude feels more like a black box, and one with so many options that it's just overwhelming,…
I'm in Claude Code 30+ hr/wk and always have a at least three tabs of CC agents open in my terminal. Agree with the other comments: pretty much running vanilla everything and only the Playwright MCP (IMO way better than the native chrome integration) and ccstatusline (for fun). Subagents can be as simple as saying "do X task(s) with subagent(s)". Skills are just self @-ing markdown files. Two of the most important th…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I got similar feedback with my first blog post on my do router - https://vexjoy.com/posts/the-do-router/ Here is what I don't get. it's trivial to do this. Mine is of course customized to me and what I do. The idea is to communicate the ideas, so you can use them in your own setup. It's trivial to put for example, my do router blog post in claude code and generate one customized for you. So what does it matter to see…
I just don't have much faith in "if you're doing it right the results will be magically better than what you get otherwise" anymore. Any single person saying "the problems you run into with using LLMs will be solved if you do it my way" has to really wow me if they want me to put in effort on their tips. I generally agree with your why of why you set up like that. I'm skeptical that it will get over the hump of where…
I'm not sure if the problems you run into with using LLMs will be solved if you do it my way. My problems are solved doing it my way. If I heard more about your problems, I would have a specific answer to them.
These are the solutions to where I have run into issues.
For sure, but my solutions are not feed the error back into the LLM. My solutions are varied, but as the blog shows, they are move as much as possible into scripts, and deterministic solutions, and keep the LLM to the smallest possible scope.
The current state of things is extremely useful for a subset of things. That subset of things feels small to me. But it may be every thing a certain person wants to do exists in that subset of things.
It just depends. We're all doing radically different things, and trying very different things.
I certainly understand and appreciate your perspective.
I struggle with these abstractions over context windows, esp when anthropic is actively focused on improving things like compaction, and knowing the eventual* goal is for the models to yave real memory layers baked in. Until then we have to optimize with how agents work best and ephemeral context is a part of that (they weren’t RL’d/trained with memory abstractions so we shouldn’t use them at inference either). Const…
There is certainly a level where at any time you could be building some abstraction that is no longer required in a month, or 3. I feel that way too. I have a lot of these things. But the reality is, it doesn't really happen that often in my actual experience. Everyone is very slow as a whole to understand what these things mean, so far you get quite a bit of time just with an improved, customized system of your own.
https://backnotprop.com/blog/50-first-dates-with-mr-meeseeks...