Live data from Hacker News

ManusAI Joins Meta

manus.im

11–20 of 221 posts

Re: ManusAI Joins Meta

#11
From their Wikipedia, because I had no idea who they were:

"Following Manus's launch in March 2025, Butterfly Effect raised $75 million in a funding round led by Benchmark at a valuation of approximately $500 million in April 2025."

Half a billion a month after launch and acquisition before the end of the same year. Wild times.

Re: ManusAI Joins Meta

#14
post #8

> This announcement is more than just a headline—it's validation of our pioneering work with General AI Agents. Anyone else thought this was satire when they read that as the second line in the announcement? I literally laughed, then clicked the top left logo, to check out the homepage and see if this `ManuAI` was a real website. --- You would think that they would know better to at least edit that out. It's not just…

I don't get it.

They are saying the announcement means more to them than just a headline that most will scroll past. Maybe you are seeing something I'm not.

Re: ManusAI Joins Meta

#15
Manus was pretty damn good at delivering impressive results well before other providers. I stopped using it because I was concerned about data privacy and and whatever extent one particular foreign country might (or might not) have hooks into Manus. Now that Meta has purchased them I know I'm safe ((sarcasm)).

I have many questions:

- Will Meta fuck this up as they seem (in my opinion) to do with most of the acquisitions? Oculus? Drop.io?

- Did they grossly overpay?

- Will innovation slow to a crawl (eg. Instagram, Whatsapp)?

- Will Manus' top talent bail?

- How is it conceivable Meta couldn't build this themselves. It can't possibly have been Manus' user base they were after, can it?

- How much trouble am I in for telling my wife to sell her Meta stock two weeks ago?

The acquisition is confusing to me.

Re: ManusAI Joins Meta

#16
post #8

> This announcement is more than just a headline—it's validation of our pioneering work with General AI Agents. Anyone else thought this was satire when they read that as the second line in the announcement? I literally laughed, then clicked the top left logo, to check out the homepage and see if this `ManuAI` was a real website. --- You would think that they would know better to at least edit that out. It's not just…

I don't get it. They are saying the announcement means more to them than just a headline that most will scroll past. Maybe you are seeing something I'm not.

[deleted]

Re: ManusAI Joins Meta

#17
post #8

> This announcement is more than just a headline—it's validation of our pioneering work with General AI Agents. Anyone else thought this was satire when they read that as the second line in the announcement? I literally laughed, then clicked the top left logo, to check out the homepage and see if this `ManuAI` was a real website. --- You would think that they would know better to at least edit that out. It's not just…

I don't get it. They are saying the announcement means more to them than just a headline that most will scroll past. Maybe you are seeing something I'm not.

Op is saying it sounds like it was written like an LLM

Re: ManusAI Joins Meta

#18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't get it. They are saying the announcement means more to them than just a headline that most will scroll past. Maybe you are seeing something I'm not.

Op is saying it sounds like it was written like an LLM

ok... it's an AI company, It'd be odd if it weren't written by AI, no?

Re: ManusAI Joins Meta

#19
post #8

> This announcement is more than just a headline—it's validation of our pioneering work with General AI Agents. Anyone else thought this was satire when they read that as the second line in the announcement? I literally laughed, then clicked the top left logo, to check out the homepage and see if this `ManuAI` was a real website. --- You would think that they would know better to at least edit that out. It's not just…

[deleted]

Re: ManusAI Joins Meta

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Op is saying it sounds like it was written like an LLM

ok... it's an AI company, It'd be odd if it weren't written by AI, no?

It is odd that they didn’t care or have the wherewithal to make it not sound obviously like an LLM wrote it.
Post reply on HN